Large cultural networks and smart specialization: What is new in regional policy diagnostic analytics?

Mecanismos de Governança da Aprendizagem Organizacional (GovA)

“…A visão da c apacidade dinâm i c a ( L I C H T E N T H A L E R ; LICHTENTHALER, 2009; EISENHART; MARTIN, 2000;TEECE, 2007;ZOLLO;WINTER, 2002) refere-se a capacidade da empresa de administrar dinamicamente sua base de conhecimento ao longo do tempo, reconfigurando e realinhando os processos de investigação e prospecção de novos conhecimentos (exploration), e o aproveitamento e a retenção (exploitation) deste conhecimento na organização e em sua rede (LICHTENTHALER;LICHTENTHALER, 2009). Entende-se que, a abordagem da GovC (FOSS, 2007) destaca que os mecanismos de governança dos conhecimentos organizacionais devem ser intencionalmente implantados para influenciar e apoiar os comportamentos e o envolvimento dos membros da organização nos processos de conhecimento, com a intenção de mitigar os custos e os riscos das transações de transferência do conhecimento nas redes inter e intraorganizacionais.…”

“…ROUILLARD et al, 2013;CHANG;UDEN, 2008;MAYERS et al, 2006a;MAYERS et al, 2006b) (Gráfico 4). LIPSHITZ, 1998LIPSHITZ, , 2000FONG;CHEN, 2012;GRANT, 1996;SPENDER, 1998;LICHTENTHALER;LICHTENTHALER, 2009;EISENHARDT;MARTIN, 2000;TEECE, 2007;ZOLLO;WINTER, 2002;KAPLAN;NORTON, 1996;PIETERSEN, 2010;STACEY, 2003;CHEN;FONG, 2013;PEMSEL;MULLER, 2012;VITRY;CHIA, 2015;BELLE, 2016;ABELL;FELIN;FOSS, 2008;FOSS, 2007;NOOTEBOOM, 2009;ANUMBA, 2009;SCHOLL et al, 2004;CHEN;MOHAMED, 2007MOHAMED, , 2008SUBRAMANIAM;VENKATRAMAN, 2001;NONAKA;TAKEUCHI, 2004;EGBU, 2006;…”

“…Foi identificada a proposição de três mecanismos de GovA: a GovC, a GC e o Ciclo de Conhecimento. A Governança do Conhecimento (GovC) dividido em mecanismos organizacionais e tecnológicos de GovC (FONG;CHEN, 2012;CHEN;MOHAMED, 2008;SUBRAMANIAM;VENKATRAMAN, 2001;NONAKA;TAKEUCHI, 2004;EGBU, 2006, ALAVI;LEIDNER, 2001;GOLD;MALHOTRA;SEGARS, 2001), a Gestão do Conhecimento (FONG;CHEN, 2012;CHEN;MOHAMED, 2007;GOLD;MALHOTRA;SEGARS, 2001;ZOLLO;WINTER, 2002;NONAKA;TAKEUCHI, 2004), e o Ciclo de evolução do conhecimento (ZOLLO;WINTER, 2002;NONAKA, 1994;NONAKA;TAKEUCHI, 1995).…”

Innovation strategies for smart specialisation (RIS3): Past, present and future research

“…Hence, some mention the importance of regions displaying identical characteristics mutually learning about the best and worst practices in terms of strategies and implementation processes (Kleibrink, Niehaves, Palop, Sörvik, & Thapa, 2015). There are also recommendations as regards future research, advocating qualitative (and even inductive) study methodologies for the field of business spirit and confidence that shapes the entrepreneurial discovery process, which is itself increasingly interrelated with smart specialisation and RIS3 (Vittoria & Napolitano, 2016). There are also recommendations as regards future research, advocating qualitative (and even inductive) study methodologies for the field of business spirit and confidence that shapes the entrepreneurial discovery process, which is itself increasingly interrelated with smart specialisation and RIS3 (Vittoria & Napolitano, 2016).…”

“…Others, in turn, point to specific policies as those for adoption at the region/country level (Casaramona, Sapia, & Soraci, 2015). There are also recommendations as regards future research, advocating qualitative (and even inductive) study methodologies for the field of business spirit and confidence that shapes the entrepreneurial discovery process, which is itself increasingly interrelated with smart specialisation and RIS3 (Vittoria & Napolitano, 2016). As regards R&D, Reimeris (2016) poses a question for future research work: Can the changes currently observed in the Lithuanian R&D system be replicated and generalised to other regions/countries?…”