2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0167-9473(99)00079-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Large data series: modeling the usual to identify the unusual

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These authors reported being able to achieve general, brief and accurate summaries in different domains. Some other works [21,22,23] have precisely advocated for segmenting the time dimension and summarize the data values within each sequence, focusing therefore in identifying frequent local cues.…”
Section: Linguistic Summarization and Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These authors reported being able to achieve general, brief and accurate summaries in different domains. Some other works [21,22,23] have precisely advocated for segmenting the time dimension and summarize the data values within each sequence, focusing therefore in identifying frequent local cues.…”
Section: Linguistic Summarization and Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering that such time-series data are relatively large or high-frequency, approaches related to sampling and periodicity pose a challenge to standard analytics tools (Varian, 2014). From a statistical viewpoint, the problem that we are looking to address here is more specifically discussed in the work of Downing, Fedorov, Lawkins, Morris, and Ostrouchov (2000). Because of size, there is the assumption that the dataset cannot be analysed at once and should be analysed in segments.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%