2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.compgeo.2014.12.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Large deformation finite element analyses in geotechnical engineering

Abstract: a b s t r a c tGeotechnical applications often involve large displacements of structural elements, such as penetrometers or footings, in soil. Three numerical analysis approaches capable of accounting for large deformations are investigated here: the implicit remeshing and interpolation technique by small strain (RITSS), an efficient Arbitrary Lagrangian-Eulerian (EALE) implicit method and the Coupled Eulerian-Lagrangian (CEL) approach available as part of commercial software. The theoretical basis and impleme… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
87
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 231 publications
(89 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
2
87
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The modified unique element method (MUEM) was adopted for this work, the robustness of which has been validated by Hu & Randolph (1998) and Wang et al (2013aWang et al ( , 2015. The field variables, such as stresses, plastic shear strains and material properties are recorded at deformed integration points, which are triangulated via Delaunay triangulation after the Lagrangian calculation of each incremental step.…”
Section: Ritss Approachmentioning
confidence: 66%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The modified unique element method (MUEM) was adopted for this work, the robustness of which has been validated by Hu & Randolph (1998) and Wang et al (2013aWang et al ( , 2015. The field variables, such as stresses, plastic shear strains and material properties are recorded at deformed integration points, which are triangulated via Delaunay triangulation after the Lagrangian calculation of each incremental step.…”
Section: Ritss Approachmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…Here a brief description of the numerical process is provided, and more details may be found in Wang et al (2010Wang et al ( , 2013bWang et al ( , 2015.…”
Section: Ritss Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…40 Other meshfree methodologies that have applied contact mechanics in geotechnical applications are the arbitrarian Lagrangian-Eulerian formulations (ALE) such as the so-called remeshing and interpolation technique by small strain developed by Randolph et al, [41][42][43] the so-called efficient ALE approach developed by Nazem et al, 44,45 and the successive built-in implementation of ALE in Abaqus/Explicit, currently known as the coupled Eulerian-Lagrangian. 46 A comparative review of these ALE methods has been recently presented by Wang et al 47 Finally, the particle finite element method, 67 an updated Lagrangian approach that avoids mesh distortion problems by frequent remeshing, seems suitable to address geotechnical insertion problems. 17,48 The aforementioned OTM 2 is based on the principle of maximum entropy, 49 with the shape functions developed by Arroyo and Ortiz.…”
Section: Numerical Implementationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These numerical methods have been successfully applied in solving challenging boundary value problems in geotechnical engineering-pile penetration analysis (Henke et al 2011;Dijkstra et al 2011), spudcan penetration analysis (GĂŒtz et al 2013) are some examples. Moreover, the CEL method has been used by a number of researchers to investigate the penetration of spudcan foundations in various soil stratigraphies (Qiu and Grabe 2012;Tho et al 2012Tho et al , 2013Pucker et al 2013;Hu et al 2014), penetration of cone (Wang et al 2015;Gupta et al 2015) and uplift capacity of rectangular plates (Chen et al 2013). Numerical simulation of common laboratory and field tests not only improve soil characterization for construction projects, but also provide a tool for cross verification analysis in more complicated boundary value problem.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%