2003
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-45087-0_37
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Large Deformation Inverse Consistent Elastic Image Registration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We compute these transformations with the LDDMM algorithm that uses the standard one-sided cost function and the novel consistent CIC and CMC method presented in this paper. Thus, we evaluate (14) (15) (16) where is the maximum inverse consistency error and is the average inverse consistency error over the domain. A summary of the maximum and the average inverse consistency errors for each of the three data-sets are shown in Tables I and II, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We compute these transformations with the LDDMM algorithm that uses the standard one-sided cost function and the novel consistent CIC and CMC method presented in this paper. Thus, we evaluate (14) (15) (16) where is the maximum inverse consistency error and is the average inverse consistency error over the domain. A summary of the maximum and the average inverse consistency errors for each of the three data-sets are shown in Tables I and II, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Practically, however, most registration methods in use have tended to use asymmetric cost functions that lead to a solution that is not inverse consistent when the template and the target images being registered are interchanged. Several papers have recently attempted to make the registration symmetric or inverse consistent [1]- [3], [8], [10], [11], [15], [17], [18], [20]- [22], [24], [25]. Here, we present two novel cost functions in the large deformation image matching framework that are symmetric with respect to the choice of template and target images being matched.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To take into account the highly non-linear elastic properties of human tissue (e.g., breast, muscle) several elastic deformation image registration algorithms have been published [3][4][5][6][7][8]. One of the dangers with elastic algorithms, however, is that some parts of the original image might vanish because of overlays or singular distortion fields [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Intensity-based registration computes a transformation between corresponding data by matching intensity functions, such as image intensity for image registration or surface curvature for surface geometric registration. Different intensitybased registration algorithms have been recently proposed [61], such as Demons [51,56], spherical Demons [58], elastic registration [23], Large Deformation diffeomorphic Metric Mapping (LDDMM) frameworks [9,10] and so on. On the other hand, landmark-based registration computes a smooth 1-1 dense pointwise correspondence between corresponding data that matches important features [2,[14][15][16]28,[39][40][41]52,54,57].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%