2020
DOI: 10.1214/20-ejp515
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Large deviations for sticky Brownian motions

Abstract: We consider n-point sticky Brownian motions: a family of n diffusions that evolve as independent Brownian motions when they are apart, and interact locally so that the set of coincidence times has positive Lebesgue measure with positive probability.These diffusions can also be seen as n random motions in a random environment whose distribution is given by so-called stochastic flows of kernels. For a specific type of sticky interaction, we prove exact formulas characterizing the stochastic flow and show that in… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In fact Barraquand and Rychnovsky conjectured in [2] that the Backwards equation for the system of sticky Brownian motions was the heat equation with the boundary conditions corresponding to b − a = 1 in (16), by looking at the Bethe ansatz answer for the system. It's important to note that for any other choice of characteristic measure ν with ν([0, 1]) = θ 2 the boundary conditions corresponding to b − a = 1 would be the same, so we do not expect these boundary conditions alone to give uniqueness of the PDE.…”
Section: Bethe Ansatz For Sticky Brownian Motionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In fact Barraquand and Rychnovsky conjectured in [2] that the Backwards equation for the system of sticky Brownian motions was the heat equation with the boundary conditions corresponding to b − a = 1 in (16), by looking at the Bethe ansatz answer for the system. It's important to note that for any other choice of characteristic measure ν with ν([0, 1]) = θ 2 the boundary conditions corresponding to b − a = 1 would be the same, so we do not expect these boundary conditions alone to give uniqueness of the PDE.…”
Section: Bethe Ansatz For Sticky Brownian Motionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence 1 ε q(1 − q)µ (ε) ⇒ θ 2 dx; since we also have 1 0 (1 − 2q)µ (ε) (dq) = 0 for all ε > 0 the theorem implies the convergence of the n-point motions of the Beta random walk in a random environment to solutions of the Howitt-Warren martingale problem with characteristic measure θ 2 ½ [0,1] dx and zero drift. This is the key motivator for looking for exact solutions in the sticky Brownian motion case and was used by Barraquand and Rychnovsky in [2] to find Fredholm determinant expressions in the sticky Brownian motions case by taking limits of those found for the Beta random walk in a random environment in [1].…”
Section: Initial Conditionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Since θ > 0, this shows, interestingly, that the trajectories X t (y 1 ), X t (y 2 ) tend to get closer as time grows, a manifestation of the phenomenon of sticky particles observed in turbulent fluids [54][55][56][57]. On the other hand, r = 1 holds independently of time, which shows that although the typical value of r decreases to zero, the distribution of r is broadening with time.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%