2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.combustflame.2021.111756
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Large eddy simulation of a supersonic lifted hydrogen flame with sparse-Lagrangian multiple mapping conditioning approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 75 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Only a smaller subset of positive Ω R+T regions are considered truly explosive. Hence, the diagostics solely based on Λ e, f may lead to an erroneous interpretation of the explosion characteristics, thereby rendering the drawn conclusions, in the best case, questionable [115][116][117][118][119][120][121][122]. This is in agreement with earlier work in turbulent and MILD combustion that reached the same conclusion and highlighted that Λ e, f can compete with dissipative modes which become more active (i.e., faster in terms of their timescales and stronger in terms of their amplitudes), hence the a priori use of solely Λ e, f for the characterisation of the system's dynamics is inappropriate [109,110,123,124].…”
Section: Computational Singular Perturbation (Csp) Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only a smaller subset of positive Ω R+T regions are considered truly explosive. Hence, the diagostics solely based on Λ e, f may lead to an erroneous interpretation of the explosion characteristics, thereby rendering the drawn conclusions, in the best case, questionable [115][116][117][118][119][120][121][122]. This is in agreement with earlier work in turbulent and MILD combustion that reached the same conclusion and highlighted that Λ e, f can compete with dissipative modes which become more active (i.e., faster in terms of their timescales and stronger in terms of their amplitudes), hence the a priori use of solely Λ e, f for the characterisation of the system's dynamics is inappropriate [109,110,123,124].…”
Section: Computational Singular Perturbation (Csp) Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%