2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheatfluidflow.2011.03.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Large Eddy Simulation of a thermal mixing tee in order to assess the thermal fatigue

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The coupling frequency with the radiation solver was however strongly limited. Nevertheless, accurate unsteady simulations such as LES to predict unsteady wall heat loads is very promising to determine thermal fatigue in combustors as recently developed in the nuclear engineering community [29,28,14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The coupling frequency with the radiation solver was however strongly limited. Nevertheless, accurate unsteady simulations such as LES to predict unsteady wall heat loads is very promising to determine thermal fatigue in combustors as recently developed in the nuclear engineering community [29,28,14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While being neglected here, subgrid-scale TRI effects are strictly not negligible and modeling studies have recently emerged [13,14]. Finally, accurate unsteady simulations such as LES to predict unsteady wall heat loads is very promising to determine thermal fatigue in combustors as recently developed in the nuclear engineering community [15][16][17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ming and Zhao (2012) and Kim and Jeong (2012) analysed the temperature fluctuations in tee junctions with diameter ratios of about unity and found large fluctuations with dominant frequencies of Strouhal numbers in the order of 0.5. Galpin and Simoneau (2011) investigated thermal fatigue phenomenon using both the Smagorinsky and the structurefunction models, the latter providing slightly better predictions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%