2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.compfluid.2017.04.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Large-eddy simulation of an air curtain confining a cavity and subjected to an external lateral flow

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…LES is in better agreement with measurements than RANS and URANS Kang and van Hooff (2022) [33] Non-isothermal side-wall jet Two opposing plane wall jets in an empty airplane cabin In the studies presented in Table 2 and within several older papers, the air movement in the room was caused by air jets such as plane jets [41,46], plane wall jets [31,34,36,38,39,46], 3D circular quasi-free sidewall jets [32,33,42,44], impinging jets [37,40,43], slightly swirling free jets [45], and confluent jets [47]. In order to validate the CFD results in the jet zone, the air velocity measurements were performed using LDA [32,40,41,44,45], a hot-wire anemometer [40,42], a three-hot-wire anemometer [33], PIV anemometry [34,37,41], a low-velocity thermal anemometer (LVTA) [38], and an ultrasonic anemometer [40]. In a previous paper [31], RANS CFD results were validated using LES results.…”
Section: Impact Of Turbulence Model On Cfd Resultsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…LES is in better agreement with measurements than RANS and URANS Kang and van Hooff (2022) [33] Non-isothermal side-wall jet Two opposing plane wall jets in an empty airplane cabin In the studies presented in Table 2 and within several older papers, the air movement in the room was caused by air jets such as plane jets [41,46], plane wall jets [31,34,36,38,39,46], 3D circular quasi-free sidewall jets [32,33,42,44], impinging jets [37,40,43], slightly swirling free jets [45], and confluent jets [47]. In order to validate the CFD results in the jet zone, the air velocity measurements were performed using LDA [32,40,41,44,45], a hot-wire anemometer [40,42], a three-hot-wire anemometer [33], PIV anemometry [34,37,41], a low-velocity thermal anemometer (LVTA) [38], and an ultrasonic anemometer [40]. In a previous paper [31], RANS CFD results were validated using LES results.…”
Section: Impact Of Turbulence Model On Cfd Resultsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…In previous CFD studies on refrigerated food applications [ 39 ], the k-ε turbulent model was widely used to solve many turbulence problems with high Re values, because it supplies adequate information regarding the turbulent process [ 40 , 41 , 42 ]. A standard k-ε model reduces the computational cost in terms of memory and CPU time [ 43 ]. The turbulence intensity (I) was needed for the CFD simulation, which was calculated by Equation (6) [ 37 ]: where is the Reynolds number calculated by hydraulic diameter.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instead, the aim was to examine the capability of a 2D k-ε model to reproduce the main phenomena and to predict the product temperatures in the display cabinet with acceptable accuracy. An example of more precise models with a three-dimensional large-eddy simulation (LES) can be found in Moureh and Yataghene (2017). The prediction of velocity profile with the refrigeration system turned "on" was compared with the results obtained from the PIV measurements.…”
Section: Cfd Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%