Volume 4A: Combustion, Fuels, and Emissions 2019
DOI: 10.1115/gt2019-90856
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Large Eddy Simulation of Lean Blow-Off in a Premixed Swirl Stabilized Flame

Abstract: Modern gas turbines usually adopt very lean premixed flames to meet the current strict law restrictions on nitric oxides emissions. In such devices, strong combustion instabilities and blow-off susceptibility often prevent from achieving a stable flame in leaner conditions. Numerical models to predict the lean blow-off in turbulent flames are essential to prevent such instabilities, but the simulation of blow-off still represents a challenge, requiring the appropriate modelling for the turbulence-chemistry int… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In any case, this analysis suggests that, despite the flame profile is wrinkled by the identified vortices, there is still a strong anchoring region represented by the high temperature core sustaining the heat release inside the IRZ. As clearly visible from Figure 8 and differently from the operating conditions far from the LBO limits characterized by the presence of hot products also in the ORZ, 3,13,[21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30] in this case the operability of the flame is ensured exclusively by the IRZ. So, in order to retrieve some clues of the destabilizing mechanism leading to the loss of flame, the discussion will be focused on the analysis of the IRZ and its interaction with the velocity field.…”
Section: Analysis Of the H1 Conditionmentioning
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In any case, this analysis suggests that, despite the flame profile is wrinkled by the identified vortices, there is still a strong anchoring region represented by the high temperature core sustaining the heat release inside the IRZ. As clearly visible from Figure 8 and differently from the operating conditions far from the LBO limits characterized by the presence of hot products also in the ORZ, 3,13,[21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30] in this case the operability of the flame is ensured exclusively by the IRZ. So, in order to retrieve some clues of the destabilizing mechanism leading to the loss of flame, the discussion will be focused on the analysis of the IRZ and its interaction with the velocity field.…”
Section: Analysis Of the H1 Conditionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Experimental LBO curve and the results of the numerical model presented in 21,30 (Top). Main test conditions characterizing the H1 and P3 test points used for the numerical investigation (Bottom).…”
Section: Experimental Test Rigmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the model was originally proposed in RANS framework, the rationale behind it can be extended to LES without particular modifications. However, the two approaches deeply differ in the flame stretch modelling, which was here inspired by previous works focused on the Turbulent Flame Closure [33][34][35]. The present work represents the extension of the Klarmann's model [27] to Large Eddy Simulation, adopting and improving the quenching effects formulation in [33][34][35] thanks to the modelling of the front curvature contribution on the flame stretch.…”
Section: Stretch and Heat Loss Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, the flame stretch definition requires the calculation of the front curvature σ c . Despite in previous LES studies it was not modelled [33][34][35]37], in this work this contribution was included by filtering its definition:…”
Section: Stretch and Heat Loss Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this paper, in order to represent the flame blush, the FGM combustion model with an extended turbulent flame speed closure for the progress variable source term is used. The mathematical implementation of this customized model can be found in Nassini et al [38,39] and Romano et al [40]. The approach implements the heat loss on the flame propagation and the combined effect of the strain rate, resulting in a improvement of the prediction of the flame front position and morphology with benefits in terms of accuracy for both emissions [41,42] and combustion dynamic [43].…”
Section: Numerical Setting Combustion and Turbulence Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%