49th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting Including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition 2011
DOI: 10.2514/6.2011-208
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Large-Eddy Simulation of Supersonic, Turbulent Mixing Layers Downstream of a Splitter Plate

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These studies showed significant differences with respect to the case of mixing layers initiated through synthetic disturbances, and highlighted the significant influence of the initial velocity deficit on the fully developed mixing layer region. Sharma, Bhaskaran & Lele (2011) further observed that the merging of a laminar and a turbulent boundary layer results in faster development of self-similar velocity profiles as compared to the case of two incoming laminar boundary layers. They also observed that in the former case the flow adjustment from the wake-dominated regime to the mixing layer regime occurs without any major instability, resulting in a significantly weaker radiated acoustic near field.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These studies showed significant differences with respect to the case of mixing layers initiated through synthetic disturbances, and highlighted the significant influence of the initial velocity deficit on the fully developed mixing layer region. Sharma, Bhaskaran & Lele (2011) further observed that the merging of a laminar and a turbulent boundary layer results in faster development of self-similar velocity profiles as compared to the case of two incoming laminar boundary layers. They also observed that in the former case the flow adjustment from the wake-dominated regime to the mixing layer regime occurs without any major instability, resulting in a significantly weaker radiated acoustic near field.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…The computational box has a size of L x × L y × L z = 120δ 0 × 47δ 0 × 12δ 0 , to be able to have fully developed upstream boundary layers, and follow the mixing layer evolution into the developed state. The computational domain has been selected based on previous experience (Foysi & Sarkar 2010;Sharma et al 2011), to minimize numerical confinement effects, within the constraints of computational cost. The origin of the coordinate system is set at the trailing edge of the splitter plate, at x 0 ≈ 40δ 0 downstream of the inflow.…”
Section: Computational Setupmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The stream in the low-speed side is laminar and lacks perturbations (Sandham & Sandberg 2009). Note that no forcing mechanism is applied in either inflow boundary layers (Sandham & Sandberg 2009;Laizet et al 2010;Sharma, Bhaskaran & Lele 2011;Pirozzoli et al 2015).…”
Section: Initial Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The computational domain, as illustrated in figure 1 (left), has a streamwise extent 200,200], similar to the domain setup used by Sharma et al (2011). The splitter plate has an elliptic trailing edge with eccentricity of 0.866, with its tip positioned at the origin, x/w = y/w = 0.…”
Section: Computational Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For forced flow, periodic heating is introduced from the actuator placed at the elliptic trailing edge by specifying an oscillatory heat flux boundary condition at a frequency f + . of x/w ∈ [−15, 400] and a maximum vertical extent of y/w ∈ [−200, 200], similar to the domain setup used by Sharma et al (2011). The splitter plate has an elliptic trailing edge with eccentricity of 0.866, with its tip positioned at the origin, x/w = y/w = 0.…”
Section: Computational Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%