2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.ces.2010.03.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Large-eddy simulation of the turbulent free-surface flow in an unbaffled stirred tank reactor

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
28
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
1
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This indicates a strong unsteadiness of the flow. Additional comparisons, at different heights can be found in a previous publication [28] which shows that most of the mean and fluctuating velocities are well described by our LES simulation. A more detailed analysis of the flow inside the vortex reactor can be provided by a spectral analysis.…”
Section: Comparison With Experimental Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…This indicates a strong unsteadiness of the flow. Additional comparisons, at different heights can be found in a previous publication [28] which shows that most of the mean and fluctuating velocities are well described by our LES simulation. A more detailed analysis of the flow inside the vortex reactor can be provided by a spectral analysis.…”
Section: Comparison With Experimental Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The dark grey and light grey dots from the edges of the dredging plume are found further away from the origin which means that the turbulence at the edges of the dredging plume is more anisotropic. For other mixing flows, like mixing inside a stirred tank also strong anisotropic turbulence was found with the two invariant values all over the Lumley triangle [54,55]. Because the turbulence inside the dredging plume is found to be strongly anisotropic, especially near the edges which are most interesting for the generation of a surface plume, it can be expected that RANS models which assume isotropic turbulence will not result in accurate surface plume predictions.…”
Section: Time Averaged Cross Sectionsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…The authors conclude that the EDC predictions could be improved by taking into account instantaneous concentrations instead of time-averaged concentrations [22]. More generally, in the literature, the studies clearly point out the advantages of the LES approach for predicting mixing phenomena [23][24][25][26], even as far as the mean flow is concerned. Especially, LES enables to capture macro-instabilities [27][28] which are known to have a strong influence on mixing and segregation.…”
Section: Les Modelling Of Micromixingmentioning
confidence: 98%