2020
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-68830-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Large eddy simulation of turbidity currents in a narrow channel with different obstacle configurations

Abstract: Turbidity currents are frequently observed in natural and man-made environments, with the potential of adversely impacting the performance and functionality of hydraulic structures through sedimentation and reduction in storage capacity and an increased erosion. Construction of obstacles upstream of hydraulic structures is a common method of tackling adverse effects of turbidity currents. This paper numerically investigates the impacts of obstacle’s height and geometrical shape on the settling of sediments and… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The advantage of DNS is that it can provide more accurate results prior to the other two methods, but it requires a lot of computational resources. By comparison, LES gives relatively satisfactory results with less computational cost, which makes it widely adopted (Kyrousi et al 2018;Goodarzi et al 2020;Koohandaz et al 2020;Pelmard, Norris & Friedrich 2018). In recent years, the coupled model of solving individual particle motion with the discrete element method (DEM) and fluid motion has been widely used to simulate two-phase flows, such as Schmeeckle (2014), Sun & Xiao (2016), Jing et al (2016), Maurin, Chauchat & Frey (2018), Pähtz & Durán (2018a), Pähtz & Durán (2018b), Pähtz & Durán (2020) and Zhu et al (2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The advantage of DNS is that it can provide more accurate results prior to the other two methods, but it requires a lot of computational resources. By comparison, LES gives relatively satisfactory results with less computational cost, which makes it widely adopted (Kyrousi et al 2018;Goodarzi et al 2020;Koohandaz et al 2020;Pelmard, Norris & Friedrich 2018). In recent years, the coupled model of solving individual particle motion with the discrete element method (DEM) and fluid motion has been widely used to simulate two-phase flows, such as Schmeeckle (2014), Sun & Xiao (2016), Jing et al (2016), Maurin, Chauchat & Frey (2018), Pähtz & Durán (2018a), Pähtz & Durán (2018b), Pähtz & Durán (2020) and Zhu et al (2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The numerical model is developed in an open-source numerical platform, OpenFOAM, designed for numerically solving continuum mechanic problems based on a tensorial approach and three-dimensional finite-volume method (FVM). Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) equations are used as the governing equations for fluid motion [19]. The continuity equation and momentum equation for incompressible fluid is adopted as:…”
Section: A Numerical Modelling Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multi-phase flows in many environmental and industrial processes are subject to nonlinear and complex changes in the flow regime, composition of different phases, temperature and pressure fluctuations [40] , [41] , [42] , [43] , [44] . These nonlinearities in multi-phase flow systems are further intensified due to the existence of disturbance sources, the effects of environmental conditions, and specifications of the multi-phase flow system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%