2009
DOI: 10.1080/17453670902804802
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Large femoral bone loss after hip revision using the uncemented proximally porous-coated Bi-Metric prosthesis

Abstract: Background and purpose Periprosthetic bone loss after uncemented femoral hip revision is a matter of concern. We have used a proximally porous- and hydroxyapatite-coated prosthesis (Bi-Metric) in revision since 1989 and now we report the bone changes. This prosthesis is intended to distribute the forces more evenly and to avoid proximal femoral unloading.Methods 22 patients were unilaterally reoperated because of aseptic loosening. Only patients with a healthy contralateral hip were included. Mean age at revis… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“… 2006 , Adolphson et al. 2009 ) is also a concern for future revisions. We observed a high incidence of atrophy in the proximal femur (62%).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 2006 , Adolphson et al. 2009 ) is also a concern for future revisions. We observed a high incidence of atrophy in the proximal femur (62%).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, functional evaluation of bone metabolism surround metallic implants with 18 F-fluoride PET is a technology under development and more validating studies in different patient groups are warranted. In summary, we found that before revision of a loose fem-gions 2, 3 and 6 between six months and 2 years (27). Adolphson et al (28) compared BMD around Bimetric stems at a mean of 6 years after revision.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…During a minimum two-year follow-up, Teratani et al noted a mean HHS score that improved from 69.6 preoperatively to 90.9 postoperatively [20]. Compared to the result of hip revision in literature, which was not encouraging in the past [22] but clinically and radiographically improved in recent studies [23,24], the functional outcome and survivorship of PAO in this cohort and others [2,9,20,21] were comparable. Therefore, we prudently suggest PAO as an alternative strategy for treating DDH in middle aged Chinese patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%