2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2008.11.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Large generation of megakaryocytes from serum-free expanded human CD34+ cells

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
16
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
2
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Inclusion of the PDGFR antagonist MK1 counteracts these effects thereby promoting megakaryocyte differentiation. The observation that PDGF-CC is expressed by CD34 + cells may explain why previous efforts supplementing cultures with exogenous PDGF failed to identify a role for PDGF in megakaryopoiesis (27). The observation that the action of MK1 happens at the expense of GM differentiation, but not at the expense of erythrocyte differentiation, further supports the notion that MK1 acts at the CMP stage.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 66%
“…Inclusion of the PDGFR antagonist MK1 counteracts these effects thereby promoting megakaryocyte differentiation. The observation that PDGF-CC is expressed by CD34 + cells may explain why previous efforts supplementing cultures with exogenous PDGF failed to identify a role for PDGF in megakaryopoiesis (27). The observation that the action of MK1 happens at the expense of GM differentiation, but not at the expense of erythrocyte differentiation, further supports the notion that MK1 acts at the CMP stage.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 66%
“…The platelets produced were partially preactivated, which is consistent with other studies assessing the properties of culture-derived platelets. 72,73 However, exposure to PMA and thrombin increased activationdependent surface marker expression on all CD41…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regardless of the abundant advantages of using UCB for transplantation compared to other cell sources, the low number of HSPCs contained in a single UCB unit, and the consequently delayed platelet recovery, has limited successful transplantation (Laughlin 2001, Koh et al 2007). Platelet recovery in cord blood (CB) transplantation takes a longer period compared to that in bone marrow (BM) or mobilized peripheral blood (MPB) cell transplantation (Chen et al 2009), as the average of number of days for platelet engraftment in UCB and MPB is nearly 70 and 20 days, respectively (Ignatz et al 2007). Th us, ex vivo expansion of megakaryocytes (Mk) derived from UCB along with HSCs might accelerate Mk diff erentiation and platelet recovery after transplantation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%