2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.coastaleng.2018.01.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Large impulsive forces on recurved parapets under non-breaking waves. A numerical study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
38
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
3
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These structures are subjected to a variety of hydraulic processes, one of the most important and extensively studied being wave overtopping, due to the danger it poses to the people, property and infrastructure being protected. Therefore, the prediction of wave overtopping is crucial and it can be achieved using three established methods [1]: by using empirical formulae derived from large datasets of laboratory and field measurements (e.g., [2][3][4][5]); by using scaled physical model tests carried out in laboratories (e.g., [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13]) some of which were included in the CLASH dataset [14] to calibrate formulae and neural network tools; or by simulating the hydraulic response of a structure using numerical models (e.g., [15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22]). Over the years, extensive research has been carried out into all of these methodologies; nonetheless, they are not perfect design tools, and they require further improvement.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These structures are subjected to a variety of hydraulic processes, one of the most important and extensively studied being wave overtopping, due to the danger it poses to the people, property and infrastructure being protected. Therefore, the prediction of wave overtopping is crucial and it can be achieved using three established methods [1]: by using empirical formulae derived from large datasets of laboratory and field measurements (e.g., [2][3][4][5]); by using scaled physical model tests carried out in laboratories (e.g., [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13]) some of which were included in the CLASH dataset [14] to calibrate formulae and neural network tools; or by simulating the hydraulic response of a structure using numerical models (e.g., [15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22]). Over the years, extensive research has been carried out into all of these methodologies; nonetheless, they are not perfect design tools, and they require further improvement.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Castellino et al [14] and Martinelli et al [15] conducted numerical and experimental investigations, respectively, of non-breaking wave forces and overtopping discharges on vertical breakwaters with parapets. Their data showed good agreement with the reduction factor proposed by Pearson et al [12].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the apparent severity of the numerical model simplifications, the suitability of this approach has been proven in the past by a number of authors who employed similar techniques to evaluate the performance of coastal structures under wave attacks (see Higuera et al [23], Tsai et al [42], and Castellino et al [14]) and other hydraulic applications involving complex air-water interactions (see Bayon and Lopez-Jimenez [43], and Bayon et al [44,45]). Table 3 shows the characteristics of the crown wall and parapets referred to in the parameters depicted in Figure 1b.…”
Section: Numerical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For a complete description of the technique used in numerical simulations and for the verification of numerical results performed also experimentally, the reader can refer to Castellino [2], Castellino et al [6] and Martinelli et al [7].…”
Section: Description Of the Numerical Simulations Inmentioning
confidence: 99%