2022
DOI: 10.1007/jhep03(2022)088
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Large logarithms from quantum gravitational corrections to a massless, minimally coupled scalar on de Sitter

Abstract: We consider single graviton loop corrections to the effective field equation of a massless, minimally coupled scalar on de Sitter background in the simplest gauge. We find a large temporal logarithm in the approach to freeze-in at late times, but no correction to the feeze-in amplitude. We also find a large spatial logarithm (at large distances) in the scalar potential generated by a point source, which can be explained using the renormalization group with one of the higher derivative counterterms regarded as … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
24
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
(69 reference statements)
1
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In Step 3, we first combine T i N (x; x ) with the remainder ∆T i L (x; x ). For our example of T 12 (x; x ), we add (35) and (42),…”
Section: Recovering the Renormalized Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In Step 3, we first combine T i N (x; x ) with the remainder ∆T i L (x; x ). For our example of T 12 (x; x ), we add (35) and (42),…”
Section: Recovering the Renormalized Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We therefore conclude that loops of inflationary gravitons contribute more strongly than matter loops by two large logarithms. It is also noteworthy that graviton loop corrections to gravity are much stronger than graviton loop corrections to fermions [25][26][27], to electrodynamics [28][29][30][31][32], and to massless, minimally coupled scalars [33][34][35]. The key difference seems to be that graviton loop corrections to gravity can involve two graviton propagators, whereas graviton corrections to other fields involve only one.…”
Section: Epiloguementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A procedure has been developed for removing this gauge dependence [42], which has been successfully applied on flat space background to graviton loop corrections to the massless, minimally coupled scalar [42], and to electromagnetism [43]. The massless, minimally coupled scalar exchange potential ha been identified as the simplest venue for generalizing this technique to de Sitter background [36], and it is hoped that a result will be available later this year. Based on flat space background experience [42,43], we expect that the elimination of gauge dependence will not eliminate large graviton logarithms but might change their numerical coefficients.…”
Section: Epiloguementioning
confidence: 99%
“…We therefore conclude that loops of inflationary gravitons contribute more strongly than matter loops by two large logarithms. It is also noteworthy that graviton loop corrections to gravity are much strong than graviton loop corrections to fermions [26][27][28], to electrodynamics [29][30][31][32][33], and to massless, minimally coupled scalars [34][35][36]. The key difference seems to be that graviton loop corrections to gravity can involve two graviton propagators whereas graviton corrections to other fields involve only one.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation