2019
DOI: 10.1002/jgt.22510
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Large monochromatic components in multicolored bipartite graphs

Abstract: It is well known that in every r‐coloring of the edges of the complete bipartite graph K m , n there is a monochromatic connected component with at least false( m + n false) / r vertices. In this paper we study an extension of this problem by replacing complete bipartite graphs by bipartite graphs of large minimum degree. We conjecture that in every r‐coloring of the edges of an ( X , Y )‐bipartite graph with false| X false| = m , false| Y false| = n , δ ( X , Y ) > false( 1 − 1 / ( r + 1 ) false) n, and… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
37
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
(30 reference statements)
0
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We note that there are examples of 3-colored complete graphs on n vertices with no monochromatic component of order larger than ∕ n 2; hence the lower bound on the order of the monochromatic component is best possible. We present the proof of Proposition 4.3 here for the sake of completeness (see also Corollary 1.9 in DeBiasio et al [4] , contradicting the above. We have thus reached a contradiction to the assumption that | | ∕ B n < 2, which completes the proof.…”
Section: Of Distinct Colorsmentioning
confidence: 76%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We note that there are examples of 3-colored complete graphs on n vertices with no monochromatic component of order larger than ∕ n 2; hence the lower bound on the order of the monochromatic component is best possible. We present the proof of Proposition 4.3 here for the sake of completeness (see also Corollary 1.9 in DeBiasio et al [4] , contradicting the above. We have thus reached a contradiction to the assumption that | | ∕ B n < 2, which completes the proof.…”
Section: Of Distinct Colorsmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…, and, thus, the components R and C x ( ) b cover the whole graph. □ Before we turn to prove Conjecture 1.5 for r = 3, we mention the following proposition, which is due to DeBiasio et al [4]. [4]).…”
Section: Of Distinct Colorsmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Recently, there has been some progress towards Conjecture 3. The best current general result was proved by DeBiasio, Krueger and Sárközy [3].…”
Section: Conjecture 3 (Gyárfás and Sárközymentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Theorem 2 (Gyárfás and Sárközy [6]). Let G be a graph of order n with δ(G) 3 4 n. If the edges of G are 2-coloured, then there exists a monochromatic component of order at least δ(G) + 1.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%