2003
DOI: 10.1090/s0002-9947-03-03276-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Large rectangular semigroups in Stone-Cech compactifications

Abstract: Abstract. We show that large rectangular semigroups can be found in certain Stone-Čech compactifications. In particular, there are copies of the 2 c × 2 c rectangular semigroup in the smallest ideal of (βN, +), and so, a semigroup consisting of idempotents can be embedded in the smallest ideal of (βN, +) if and only if it is a subsemigroup of the 2 c × 2 c rectangular semigroup. In fact, we show that for any ordinal λ with cardinality at most c, βN contains a semigroup of idempotents whose rectangular componen… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Equivalently, e < L f if and only if Se is a proper subset of Sf . Using a result from [6] we show here that one can get chains as long as possible below any nonminimal idempotent in βN, provided that one weakens the strictly decreasing requirement at limit ordinals to the requirement that if σ < τ , then p τ < L p σ . We will use the following extension of Lemma 2.3.…”
Section: Countable Left Cancellative Semigroupsmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Equivalently, e < L f if and only if Se is a proper subset of Sf . Using a result from [6] we show here that one can get chains as long as possible below any nonminimal idempotent in βN, provided that one weakens the strictly decreasing requirement at limit ordinals to the requirement that if σ < τ , then p τ < L p σ . We will use the following extension of Lemma 2.3.…”
Section: Countable Left Cancellative Semigroupsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Besides the ordering ≤ of idempotents in a semigroup, there are transitive and reflexive relations ≤ L and ≤ R defined by e ≤ L f if ef = e, and e ≤ R f if f e = e. We write e < L f when e ≤ L f and it is not the case that f ≤ L e. Similarly we write e < R f when e ≤ R f and it is not the case that f ≤ R e. Of course e ≤ f if and only if both e ≤ L f and e ≤ R f . In [6] it was shown that given any ordinal λ with |λ| ≤ c, there exist chains q σ σ<λ of idempotents in βN such that q σ < L q τ whenever τ < σ < λ and q σ+1 < q σ for all σ with σ + 1 < λ. In Section 5 we extend this result by showing that for each nonminimal idempotent q in βN, there is such a chain with q 0 = q.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Proof. The first assertion is an immediate consequence of [9,Corollary 3.15]. Let H = ∞ n=1 2 n N. By [8, Lemma 6.8], H is a compact subsemigroup of (βN, +) which contains all of the idempotents.…”
Section: Theorem 22mentioning
confidence: 97%