2021
DOI: 10.1080/14767058.2021.1946781
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Large retrospective cohort study of the association between maternal 25-hydroxyvitamin D status and birth weight of neonate

Abstract: Background:The effect of maternal vitamin D status on the birth weight of offspring is controversial as the results are inconsistent between different populations. This large 2 retrospective cohort study aimed to assess the relationship between maternal vitamin D levels and birth weight of neonate. Methods: Serum samples were collected from 10,586 Chinese women in the 2 nd trimester of pregnancy, and the 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] level of the participants was assessed.Using the INTERGROWTH-21st standards, … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, a recent large retrospective cohort study from southern China with 10.586 participants did not find significant differences in maternal Vit-D levels between the three neonatal groups (small, appropriate, and large for gestational age). The authors deduced that maternal 25(OH)D levels was not an effective predictor, neither of SGA or LGA neonates [ 78 ]. In line with this study, in their large prospective studies, both Boyle et al [ 79 ] in New Zealand, as well as Zhou et al [ 80 ] in southern China, reported no significant associations between midgestational maternal levels of Vit-D and adverse neonatal outcomes including SGA neonates.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, a recent large retrospective cohort study from southern China with 10.586 participants did not find significant differences in maternal Vit-D levels between the three neonatal groups (small, appropriate, and large for gestational age). The authors deduced that maternal 25(OH)D levels was not an effective predictor, neither of SGA or LGA neonates [ 78 ]. In line with this study, in their large prospective studies, both Boyle et al [ 79 ] in New Zealand, as well as Zhou et al [ 80 ] in southern China, reported no significant associations between midgestational maternal levels of Vit-D and adverse neonatal outcomes including SGA neonates.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An observational cohort study followed 149 healthy pregnant women pointed maternal vitamin D levels did not correlate with neonatal serum glucose or insulin levels ( 15 ). To date, all of the results of relevant studies are inconsistent and conflicting ( 5 , 16 , 17 ). These differences may be explained by several confounding factors including sample size, geographical location, gestational age at sampling, end time of observation indicator and the rate of vitamin D deficiency ( 16 , 17 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To date, all of the results of relevant studies are inconsistent and conflicting ( 5 , 16 , 17 ). These differences may be explained by several confounding factors including sample size, geographical location, gestational age at sampling, end time of observation indicator and the rate of vitamin D deficiency ( 16 , 17 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%