2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jas.2010.12.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Large-scale 2nd to 3rd century AD bloomery iron smelting in Korea

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
12
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
2
12
1
Order By: Relevance
“…4). The identification of magnetite in the white lines is in accordance with the published literature [34,35]. Additionally, two intense bands in the region of 700 and 1100 cm -1 are attributed to Fe-rich olivine corresponding to fayalite member [37][38][39].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…4). The identification of magnetite in the white lines is in accordance with the published literature [34,35]. Additionally, two intense bands in the region of 700 and 1100 cm -1 are attributed to Fe-rich olivine corresponding to fayalite member [37][38][39].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Elongated olivine crystallizes perpendicular to the white skins, which means that the lower flow was already cooled before the following flow arrived. This structure is well known from geological lava flows and tap-slags as spinifex texture [34]. White lines in smelting slags are explained as thin skins of magnetite formed when the surface of the slag flow oxidizes in contact with air [34,35].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…Besides, the early form of plate-type objects is contemporaneous with or even predates the full establishment in China of such iron technology. By contrast, Park and Rehren (2011) found evidence of large-scale bloomery smelting practiced in the heartland of Korea in the AD 2nd to 3rd century. Their evidence confirms the theory proposed by Choi et al (1998a,b) and Yun (1984), two pillars in Korean historical metallurgy, who did not discuss the technological and historical implications behind their theory at the time.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…By contrast, in an iron industry based on bloomery technology the iron would have come directly from smelting and naturally takes the shape of a plate during the smelting process. Recently, Park and Rehren (2011) discovered evidence of large-scale 2nd to 3rd century AD bloomery smelting from an iron-producing site in the former Baekje territory. Their discovery supports the belief held by most Korean scholars that bloomery smelting was practiced in ancient Korea.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the article by Kozhevnikov et al () was published in a geophysical journal, it attracted the attention of archaeologists and historians, because the site Barun‐Khal 2 has established a ‘point’ which is supposed to trace the spread of the bloomery smelting technology through the northern part of East Asia (Lochin, ; Park, Gelegdorj, & Chimiddorj, ; Park & Rehren, ; Radtke, Reiche, Reinholz, Riesemeier, & Guerra, ; Sasada & Chuang, ; Xiongnu Archaeology, ) and even Alaska (Gelvin‐Reymiller & Reuther, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%