2014
DOI: 10.1051/matecconf/20141411001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Large scale 3-D phase-field simulation of coarsening in Ni-base superalloys

Abstract: Abstract. In this study we present a large scale numerical simulation of γ -γ microstructure evolution in Nibase superalloy using the multi-phase field method in three dimensions. We numerically simulated precipitation hardening heat treatment cycles. Large scale three dimensional simulations are necessary in order to get sufficient statistics for predicting the morphological evolution, average γ precipitate size, precipitates size distribution over time and ripening exponent for a given temperature and compos… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Experimental micrographs are cropped to the same size as the 2D cuts from simulations to eliminate the influence of observation window size. The initial microstructure in figure 3 is derived from simulating the precipitation hardening heat treatment process of a Ni-base SXs [36], and exhibits a typical morphology of Ni-base SXs where the cuboidal γ ′ precipitates with similar size and shape are distributed homogeneously in the γ matrix. Comparing to the experiment, the simulated γ ′ precipitates hold rounder corners.…”
Section: Correlation Between Simulation Results and Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Experimental micrographs are cropped to the same size as the 2D cuts from simulations to eliminate the influence of observation window size. The initial microstructure in figure 3 is derived from simulating the precipitation hardening heat treatment process of a Ni-base SXs [36], and exhibits a typical morphology of Ni-base SXs where the cuboidal γ ′ precipitates with similar size and shape are distributed homogeneously in the γ matrix. Comparing to the experiment, the simulated γ ′ precipitates hold rounder corners.…”
Section: Correlation Between Simulation Results and Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since both γ and γ′ phases have an FCC-like structure, only the volumetric contribution of the lattice mismatch strain is set to a value of −0.003, based on experimental observation [33]. Furthermore, a γ γ − ′ interfacial energy of 80 mJ m −2 is used, which is the same as [34]. In order to maintain the stability of γ matrix channels and to prevent the coalescence of γ′ precipitates as the case in the experiment, we use the wetting condition at γ γ γ − − ′ ′ triple junctions that creates repulsion between γ′ particles by setting the interfacial energy between γ′ particles to be 3 times higher than the value for the γ γ − ′ interface.…”
Section: Phase-field Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The MPF method as developed by the last author and coworkers is a powerful approach to moving boundary problems in general [19]. It allows us to address the solidification and coarsening of metals [27,28] and is compatible with transport methods in bulk phases, for example, the Lattice Boltzmann method applied to microfluidity [29,30]. Each grain α is represented by one scalar field ϕ α .…”
Section: Mpf Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%