2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2017.01.048
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Large scale bioaugmentation of soil contaminated with petroleum hydrocarbons using a mixed microbial consortium

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
22
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
1
22
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In bioaugmentation, the use of both consortia and pure cultures has been tested; bacteria are usually considered more effective than fungi in the biodegradation of hydrocarbons . Some of the most active bacterial hydrocarbon degraders are the Pseudomonas , Rhodococcus , Acinetobacter and Alcaligenes genera …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In bioaugmentation, the use of both consortia and pure cultures has been tested; bacteria are usually considered more effective than fungi in the biodegradation of hydrocarbons . Some of the most active bacterial hydrocarbon degraders are the Pseudomonas , Rhodococcus , Acinetobacter and Alcaligenes genera …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…21 Some of the most active bacterial hydrocarbon degraders are the Pseudomonas, Rhodococcus, Acinetobacter and Alcaligenes genera. 11,12,[22][23][24] Bioaugmentation can also be coupled with biostimulation to further stimulate the introduced biomass. In fact, microorganisms may consume soil mineral nutrients too rapidly for the metabolism of the organic material, and the introduction of microorganisms could therefore require the addition of mineral nutrients to be effective.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For its removal, in situ bioremediation is considered an environmentally friendly and cost-effective solution, due to the metabolic capability of microorganisms to degrade the pollutants. So far, bioremediation is performed by means of • biostimulation: The addition of macro-and/or micronutrients to enhance indigenous biomass growth and pollutant degradation [1,2]; • bioaugmentation: The addition of enriched microbial cultures (autochthonous or allochthonous degraders) to the soil [3]; • combined biostimulation and bioaugmentation [4,5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies were carried out in different operative conditions, adopting one of the aforesaid strategies, and aimed to optimize hydrocarbon removal [3,[6][7][8][9]. It is widely known that biostimulation is an easier process to carry out [2,5,10,11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, Poi et al employed an adapted indigenous consortium consisting of 22 strains: mainly Bacillus, Pseudomonas and Acinetobacter spp. in a large scale bioaugmentation system for clean-up of soil contaminated with petroleum hydrocarbons; they concluded that this system constitutes a proper method for the treatment of full-scale petroleum polluted soil (Poi et al, 2017). It is entirely clear that the main upside of using a consortium, instead of a single microorganism, is its synergistic effect, because one species degrades toxic metabolites, which may hinder the growth of other strains and, in turn, this collective system promotes the bioremediation process (Ghazali et al, 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%