2004
DOI: 10.1128/jcm.42.10.4566-4576.2004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Large-Scale Comparative Genomics Meta-Analysis of Campylobacter jejuni Isolates Reveals Low Level of Genome Plasticity

Abstract: We have used comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) on a full-genome Campylobacter jejuni microarray to examine genome-wide gene conservation patterns among 51 strains isolated from food and clinical sources. These data have been integrated with data from three previous C. jejuni CGH studies to perform a metaanalysis that included 97 strains from the four separate data sets. Although many genes were found to be divergent across multiple strains (n ‫؍‬ 350), many genes (n ‫؍‬ 249) were uniquely variable in sin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

9
118
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 101 publications
(127 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
9
118
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus Taboada et al (14) propose large regions of the C. jejuni genome are genetically stable. Of the highly divergent genes that were identified 117 of 122 genes had divergent neighbors and showed high levels of intraspecies variability (14). Another recent study used DNA microarrays to address the issue of whether genetic markers specific to strains causing GBS could be identified.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus Taboada et al (14) propose large regions of the C. jejuni genome are genetically stable. Of the highly divergent genes that were identified 117 of 122 genes had divergent neighbors and showed high levels of intraspecies variability (14). Another recent study used DNA microarrays to address the issue of whether genetic markers specific to strains causing GBS could be identified.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this particular study, algorithms were used that selected a dynamic boundary between the conserved and variable genes similar to the GACK algorithm (13). More recently, genomic comparisons of 51 strains isolated from food and clinical sources have been integrated with data from the three previous C. jejuni DNA microarray studies (10)(11)(12) to perform a metaanalysis that included 97 strains from the four separate data sets (14). In that study (14), a large proportion of the variable genes were found to be absent or divergent in single strains only, and these uniquely variable genes could be mapped to previously defined variable loci.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The relative hybridization intensity at each arrayed locus corresponds to the likelihood that the gene is present in the tester strains. Bacterial CGH studies have been extraordinarily successful in quantifying genome variability 1 and characterizing the differences between pathogenic and nonpathogenic strains, but to date this approach has not been used for the large-scale identification of host-associated virulence factors (Behr et al 1999;Salama et al 2000;Hakenbeck et al 2001;Israel et al 2001;Malloff et al 2001;Perrin et al 2002;Saunders et al 2004;Taboada et al 2004;Tsolaki et al 2004;Zhong et al 2004;Lindroos et al 2005;Porwollik et al 2005;Taboada et al 2005;van Leeuwen et al 2005;Yao et al 2005).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Full details of the CGF typing method outlined here will be published elsewhere (53a). Prospective typing markers for inclusion into the CGF typing scheme were identified by microarray-based comparative genomics (51)(52)(53) and were selected based on a binary distribution (presence or absence) in microarray data from many isolates. Of the genes that exhibited variable carriage in these isolates, 43 were subsequently selected for the development of the CGF typing method.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this work, we have compared the results from the typing of Campylobacter isolates using PFGE; the Oxford MLST method; the Oxford flaA SVR typing method; combined MLST and flaA SVR typing (MLST ϩ flaA SVR); porA sequence typing (6,28) (http://pubmlst .org/campylobacter/); combined MLST, flaA SVR, and porA sequence typing (MLST ϩ flaA SVR ϩ porA); and comparative genomic fingerprinting (CGF), a newly developed multiplex PCR method designed to detect Campylobacter genes that were identified as having a high degree of intraspecies variability in comparative genomic hybridizations using DNA microarrays (33,51). Each method or combination of methods appeared to group isolates at different levels within the population and therefore was useful for a different purpose.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%