Large‐scale curriculum reform in Finland – exploring the interrelation between implementation strategy, the function of the reform, and curriculum coherence

Abstract

The study aims to gain a better understanding of the national large‐scale curriculum process in terms of the used implementation strategies, the function of the reform, and the curriculum coherence perceived by the stakeholders accountable in constructing the national core curriculum in Finland. A large body of school reform literature has shown that a central determinant for the effectiveness of curriculum reform is the way in which the reform is implemented. Accordingly, implementing curriculum reform always entails translation of the new ideas into new educational practices, which involves complex sense‐making processes from those involved. Altogether, 117 stakeholders accountable in constructing the national core curriculum in Finland completed a survey. The results showed that the effect of the implementation strategy for the perceived curriculum coherence was mediated by the perceived educational impact of the reform both for the school and society. The mediated interrelation between the top‐down–bottom‐up implementation strategy in the curriculum process, and the estimated coherence in the written core curriculum implies that the objects of the activities, namely elaborating and focusing on the educational impact of the decisions, is a crucial determinant for achieving curriculum coherence, and further, facilitating sustainable school development at the local level.

An investigation into the curriculum ideology that foregrounds the presentation of HIV/AIDS content in selected South Africa Life Sciences textbooks

“…For example, Hoeg and Bencze (2017) suggest that in the USA curriculum reforms were introduced to improve the global socio-scientific and economic competitiveness of the USA. Pietarinen, Pyhältö, and Soini (2017) posit that curriculum reform may also seek to translate and integrate emerging scientific discoveries into educational practices in the promotion of social equity Porter, Fusarelli, & Fusarelli, 2015. However, in some instances, curriculum reform may be based on the need to transform educational philosophies and theories that underpin education, such as moving away from teacher-centered pedagogies to student-centered ones (Bulut, 2007).…”

Governance decentralisation in education: Finnish innovation in education

“…According to the first results of that study, the process has been successful (Pietarinen et al, 2016); the top-down-bottom-up strategy facilitated meaningful collective sense-making, which affected the coherence of the curriculum. However, the outcome of the collective sense-making process could best be elaborated upon in terms of its educational impact at the school level.…”

Making sense while steering through the fog: Principals’ metaphors within a national reform implementation

“…Leaving room for interpretation of policy intent, as well as sensing educators' perceptions regarding reform regulations, is crucial. This process should not just leave space for sense-making, but should also urge all stakeholders involved in the reform to work collaboratively while experimenting on how this is going to affect their school reality (Pietarinen, Pyhältö, & Soini, 2017;Priestley, Edwards, Priestley, & Miller, 2012). In this sense, principals need to weave the social sense-making network for discussions about what educational reform actually means as well as how it will influence the everyday life of teachers and students.…”