2021
DOI: 10.1093/plphys/kiab324
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Large-scale field phenotyping using backpack LiDAR and CropQuant-3D to measure structural variation in wheat

Abstract: Plant phenomics bridges the gap between traits of agricultural importance and genomic information. Limitations of current field-based phenotyping solutions include mobility, affordability, throughput, accuracy, scalability and the ability to analyse big data collected. Here, we present a large-scale phenotyping solution that combines a commercial backpack LiDAR device and our analytic software, CropQuant-3D, which have been applied jointly to phenotype wheat (Triticum aestivum) and associated 3D trait analysis… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 97 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…LiDAR has many advantages, including 1) strong penetration ability that can characterize the inner structure of the canopy, 2) real and direct 3D characterization of an object without a complicated reconstruction process, and 3) insensitive to illumination. According to different mounting platforms, LiDAR systems used for crop height measurement mainly include terrestrial laser scanning (TLS) (Tilly et al, 2014b;Guo et al, 2019), backpack laser scanning (BLS) (Zhu et al, 2021), gantry laser scanning (GLS) (Li et al, 2022c;Sun et al, 2022), and unmanned-aerial-vehicle laser scanning (ULS) (Zhou et al, 2020;Luo et al, 2021;Sofonia et al, 2019). In contrast to the active LiDAR sensing technologies, passive sensing-based methods (e.g., Multi-view images) can also measure 3D structure through methods like structure from motion (SFM) (Holman et al, 2016;Malambo et al, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…LiDAR has many advantages, including 1) strong penetration ability that can characterize the inner structure of the canopy, 2) real and direct 3D characterization of an object without a complicated reconstruction process, and 3) insensitive to illumination. According to different mounting platforms, LiDAR systems used for crop height measurement mainly include terrestrial laser scanning (TLS) (Tilly et al, 2014b;Guo et al, 2019), backpack laser scanning (BLS) (Zhu et al, 2021), gantry laser scanning (GLS) (Li et al, 2022c;Sun et al, 2022), and unmanned-aerial-vehicle laser scanning (ULS) (Zhou et al, 2020;Luo et al, 2021;Sofonia et al, 2019). In contrast to the active LiDAR sensing technologies, passive sensing-based methods (e.g., Multi-view images) can also measure 3D structure through methods like structure from motion (SFM) (Holman et al, 2016;Malambo et al, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…LiDAR can record the spatial coordinates (XYZ) and intensity information of a target by measuring the distance between the sensor and the target with a laser and analyzing the time of flight (ToF) (Sun et al, 2018). Although the spatial resolution of the 3D model produced by LiDAR is not as dense as those obtained by image-based methods, it is sufficient for extracting most plant morphologic traits (Zhu et al, 2021). As an active sensor, LiDAR can operate regardless of illumination conditions, and 3D lasers were considered to have lower throughput for 1-2 minutes were required to collect data at each plot (Virlet et al, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…duckweed) compared with dryland crops (Ogawa et al ., 2021). Moreover, few research groups have the resources to process large‐scale aerial images, or to develop complex algorithms to address problems in automated trait analysis (Roitsch et al ., 2019; Zhu et al ., 2021). Hence, along with the development of open‐source computer vision, machine learning and data science libraries (Howse, 2013; Virtanen et al ., 2020), open solutions will be valuable to equip plant researchers with new toolkits to study complicated crops.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%