Large‐scale geophysical archaeological prospection pilot study at Viking Age and medieval sites in west Jutland, Denmark

Abstract

In 2014, a team of the Ludwig Boltzmann Institute for Archaeological Prospection and Virtual Archaeology, in collaboration with Holstebro Museum, conducted a geophysical archaeological prospection pilot study at several Viking Age and medieval sites in West Jutland, Denmark; sites that had been discovered earlier by aerial archaeology. The high‐resolution surveys employed motorized ground‐penetrating radar (GPR) and magnetometer systems as well as novel post‐processing software. The aim of this study was to test the suitability of these methods and the chosen approach to efficiently explore, investigate and document prehistoric settlements on a large scale under the prevalent environmental conditions in this part of Denmark. Over the course of five days of fieldwork, numerous structures of archaeological interest, such as the remains of longhouses, property boundaries, pathways, pit houses and other buried remains of the settlements, were detected and mapped. The combination of the data gathered by magnetic and GPR prospection with the already existing aerial imagery permitted an integrated archaeological interpretation, resulting in considerable new knowledge about the investigated sites. In this paper, we present the results obtained for the Viking Age settlement at Stadil Mølleby and a medieval village near Rysensten, both situated on sandy soils.

Are We There Yet? A Review and Assessment of Archaeological Passive Airborne Optical Imaging Approaches in the Light of Landscape Archaeology

“…For instance, high topsoil salinity or wet and clayish conditions can render ground-penetrating radar almost useless. As a result, archaeological features might show up in aerial photographs but not in geophysical datasets [215,216]. Since both excavations and geophysical methods can only recover some specific aspects of the preserved archaeological record, their data are thus by default also incomplete.…”

Thermal Imaging for the Archaeological Investigation of Historic Buildings

“…Unlike below-ground excavation where anomalies can effectively be ground-truthed through destructive methodology, historic buildings are both subject to special legislative protection and also to professional considerations to conserve intact historic fabric [63]. Many remote, nondestructive methods have been developed to assist in this process [1,64] and are capable of yielding information on concealed archaeological anomalies within standing building fabric in a like manner to the way geophysics is used to survey below ground archaeology [65][66][67].…”

A multiproxy approach to studying a large prehistoric enclosure in Ojców, Kraków Upland, Poland

“…In the last few decades, the use of modern non-invasive prospecting methods has accelerated studies of large archaeological sites, including prehistoric embankments (Abbas et al, 2012;Bewley et al, 2005;Filzwieser et al, 2017;Gojda, 2004Gojda, , 2006Saunaluoma et al, 2019). It is especially important in densely forested areas (Chevance et al, 2019;Doneus et al, 2008;Inomata et al, 2020;Masini et al, 2018;Risbøl & Gustavsen, 2018).…”