2018
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.2006643
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Large-scale investigation of the reasons why potentially important genes are ignored

Abstract: Biomedical research has been previously reported to primarily focus on a minority of all known genes. Here, we demonstrate that these differences in attention can be explained, to a large extent, exclusively from a small set of identifiable chemical, physical, and biological properties of genes. Together with knowledge about homologous genes from model organisms, these features allow us to accurately predict the number of publications on individual human genes, the year of their first report, the levels of fun… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

13
250
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 233 publications
(264 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
13
250
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Considering the PPI network, the higher degree centrality of genes differentially expressed with age in most tissues is not especially surprising. Several of the identified genes are well studied and PPI data favours proteins of high abundance (von Mering et al, 2002) and with high publication coverage (Stoeger et al, 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering the PPI network, the higher degree centrality of genes differentially expressed with age in most tissues is not especially surprising. Several of the identified genes are well studied and PPI data favours proteins of high abundance (von Mering et al, 2002) and with high publication coverage (Stoeger et al, 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Significant efforts in biological research have been devoted to defining the molecular and physiological functions of genes. However, many genes are still not well annotated and even remain uncharacterized (Edwards et al 2011;Dolgin 2017;Stoeger et al 2018). Here we developed an approach, termed G-MAD, to facilitate the identification of novel gene functions and to establish robust connections between genes and modules.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is also true for gene annotations retrieved from other sources, such as GeneRIF (Gene Reference Into Function) (Mitchell et al 2003 ). The phenomenon that many genes are ignored in biological research has been pointed out before (Edwards et al 2011;Pandey et al 2014;Stoeger et al 2018). Several possible reasons for this bias, such as prior knowledge, publication bias, and priorities of funding support have been raised (Edwards et al 2011;Greene and Troyanskaya 2012;Stoeger et al 2018).…”
Section: Current Status Of Gene Annotationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This approach, coupled with semantic similarity methods for example, can 17 be used to compare diseases [5]. One difficulty in using solely curated or semantic data 18 sources, is the tendency for curatorial processes to produce annotations that are biased 19 toward well-studied species and processes, resulting in an uneven distribution of 20 annotations [6,7]. Furthermore, gene annotations are affected by the idiosyncrasies of 21 experimental systems and assays [8] which may impact downstream analysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%