2013
DOI: 10.2112/si65-256.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Large-scale laboratory observations of beach morphodynamics and turbulence beneath shoaling and breaking waves

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

4
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ruessink et al [] analyzed 3‐D sonar scans collected during the same experiment and showed also an increase in the 3‐D ripple irregularity when H s / h increased. The increase of Q b with H s / h was also apparent from the turbulence magnitude, as de Winter et al [] and Brinkkemper et al [] showed the increase of the time‐averaged turbulent kinetic energy with H s / h for this data set, especially when H s / h > 0.65. Besides the magnitude also the vertical turbulence profile changed, from an increase toward the bottom under nonbreaking waves to an increase both toward the bottom and to the surface beneath breaking waves.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 61%
“…Ruessink et al [] analyzed 3‐D sonar scans collected during the same experiment and showed also an increase in the 3‐D ripple irregularity when H s / h increased. The increase of Q b with H s / h was also apparent from the turbulence magnitude, as de Winter et al [] and Brinkkemper et al [] showed the increase of the time‐averaged turbulent kinetic energy with H s / h for this data set, especially when H s / h > 0.65. Besides the magnitude also the vertical turbulence profile changed, from an increase toward the bottom under nonbreaking waves to an increase both toward the bottom and to the surface beneath breaking waves.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 61%
“…All pressure series were converted to water-surface elevation ζ series using linear wave theory, which were processed into the short-wave (0.05-2 Hz) (1) significant wave orbital diameter d s = H s / sinh(kh), where H s is the local significant wave height, and k is the wave number estimated from linear theory using water depth h and the peak period T p1 at the most seaward pressure transducer (x = 36.2 m in Figure 1); (2) peak semi-orbital velocity u w = πd s /T p1 ; (3) mobility number ψ = u 2 w /(RgD 50 ), (4) Shields parameter θ = 0.5f w ψ, where f w is a friction factor for which we used Equations (60a) and (60b) in [35]; (5) wave Reynolds number Re w = 0.5u w d s /ν; (6) wave skewness S ζ = ζ 3 /σ 3 ζ , where the overbar represent a run average and σ ζ is the standard deviation of ζ; and, (7) wave asymmetry A ζ = H (ζ) 3 /σ 3 ζ , where H (ζ) represents the Hilbert transform of ζ. Because the paddle motion was not repeated exactly in each run, the resulting wave height and period varied slightly from run to run [36]. We therefore preferred the use of the measured peak period at the most seaward sensor T p1 (see Table 1) over the target value T p0 in the computation of d s and u w .…”
Section: Measurements: Hydrodynamical Datamentioning
confidence: 99%