2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2018.04.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Large-scale mapping of gully-affected areas: An approach integrating Google Earth images and terrain skeleton information

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since the end of 1990s, the emergence and development of digital terrain analysis based on digital elevation models (DEMs) provided important conditions for the research of geomorphology, especially on large scales (Wilson and Gallant 2000;Florinsky 2002;Li et al 2005b;Tang et al 2005;Florinsky 2011;Wilson 2012;Li et al 2016;Luo et al 2020). The key of digital terrain analysis is extraction and geostatistical analysis of the topographic feature elements (including topographic feature point, line, and surface) and topographic factors (such as slope gradient, slope direction, plane curvature, profile curvature, topographic relief, coefficient of elevation variation, surface cutting depth) based on DEMs (Oostwoud Wijdenes et al 2000;Hancock and Evans 2006;McNamara et al 2006;Yang et al 2009;Tang 2014;Torri et al 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the end of 1990s, the emergence and development of digital terrain analysis based on digital elevation models (DEMs) provided important conditions for the research of geomorphology, especially on large scales (Wilson and Gallant 2000;Florinsky 2002;Li et al 2005b;Tang et al 2005;Florinsky 2011;Wilson 2012;Li et al 2016;Luo et al 2020). The key of digital terrain analysis is extraction and geostatistical analysis of the topographic feature elements (including topographic feature point, line, and surface) and topographic factors (such as slope gradient, slope direction, plane curvature, profile curvature, topographic relief, coefficient of elevation variation, surface cutting depth) based on DEMs (Oostwoud Wijdenes et al 2000;Hancock and Evans 2006;McNamara et al 2006;Yang et al 2009;Tang 2014;Torri et al 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…GE imagery, a type of optical imaging technology, is the only data source used for gully mapping in this paper. Although there is an unquestionable link between topographic attributes and the occurrence of gullies, which helps to improve the extraction of gullies (as suggested by recent studies) [23,25,63], the acquisition and update of high-precision topographic data remain difficult for a vast number of users compared to optical imagery, especially when conducting regional gully erosion surveys and mapping. Hence, this type of data selection allows more people to use the method presented and facilitates large-scale gully erosion investigations at the sacrifice of some accuracy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the development of computational statistical models, recent work on the combination of object-oriented analysis and the Random Forest (RF) algorithm has improved the degree of automation and objectivity to a large extent [22][23][24][25]. The RF based on bootstrap aggregation and ensembles of classification trees is a well-accepted performance optimization algorithm.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, some DEM-based topographic methods, considering the relationship between topographic attributes and gully distribution, have also been designed for gully feature extraction [40,41]. However, they are also accuracy-limited due to be sensitive to terrain characteristics of study area (e.g., the misestimation of gully area in four study areas in Spain ranged from 13.6% to 24% [40] and gully width was overestimated by up to 30% in the Bleaklow Plateau of the UK [41]), consequently which need to be improved further when applied in different regions [42]. As a result, gully detection and delineation on images is still done visually and manually in most studies because of the convincing accuracy of this way.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%