83rd EAGE Annual Conference &Amp; Exhibition 2022
DOI: 10.3997/2214-4609.202210228
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Large-Scale Pre-Stack Seismic Depth-Domain Inversion : A Case Study from the Northern Carnarvon Basin, Offshore Australia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, extracted the wavelet from depth-domain seismic data using pseudo-depth conversion and the Gibbs sampling algorithm [18]. Moreover, according to the pseudo-depth conversion, Zhang et al (2022) searched for the wavelet that minimizes the residual difference between the synthetic record and the field data as the estimated constant wavelet in the pseudo-depth domain [19]. In short, domain conversion is timeconsuming and introduces additional uncertainty to the geophysical workflow [20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, extracted the wavelet from depth-domain seismic data using pseudo-depth conversion and the Gibbs sampling algorithm [18]. Moreover, according to the pseudo-depth conversion, Zhang et al (2022) searched for the wavelet that minimizes the residual difference between the synthetic record and the field data as the estimated constant wavelet in the pseudo-depth domain [19]. In short, domain conversion is timeconsuming and introduces additional uncertainty to the geophysical workflow [20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fletcher et al (2012Fletcher et al ( , 2016 replaced the 1D wavelet in conventional time-depth inversion with the point spread functions of depth imaging processing, attaining direct seismic inversion in the depth domain [21,22]. Then this idea was applied to complex subsalt environments [25][26][27][28], depth-domain Q compensation [29], depth-domain deghosting [30], pre-stack depth-domain elastic inversion [31][32][33], 4D inversion in the depth domain [34], and enhanced quantitative interpretation [35]. However, solving the point spread function requires a long computation time and large storage space, and the accuracy of the solution is highly dependent on the accuracy of the built depth-domain velocity model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%