2016
DOI: 10.1038/ngeo2806
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Large-scale subduction of continental crust implied by India–Asia mass-balance calculation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
149
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 124 publications
(155 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
4
149
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Detrital zircons, petrology, and geochemistry of the Zhongba sandstone suggest affinities with Indian continental crust and correlate with other passive margin deposits in the Tethyan Himalaya, such as the sandstones in the Zanskar Range of northern India, the Kumaon Himalayas, and the Thakkhola region of central Nepal (Du et al, ). Buoyant upper continental crust from the Greater Indian lithosphere could have been partially decoupled and stripped away from the down‐going plate to become incorporated in the Himalayan fold‐thrust belt, with the rest of the lithosphere being subducted (Ingalls et al, ). Thus, the large extent of Greater India, now defined quantitatively in our study, is compatible with models evoking crustal thickening via mass accumulation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Detrital zircons, petrology, and geochemistry of the Zhongba sandstone suggest affinities with Indian continental crust and correlate with other passive margin deposits in the Tethyan Himalaya, such as the sandstones in the Zanskar Range of northern India, the Kumaon Himalayas, and the Thakkhola region of central Nepal (Du et al, ). Buoyant upper continental crust from the Greater Indian lithosphere could have been partially decoupled and stripped away from the down‐going plate to become incorporated in the Himalayan fold‐thrust belt, with the rest of the lithosphere being subducted (Ingalls et al, ). Thus, the large extent of Greater India, now defined quantitatively in our study, is compatible with models evoking crustal thickening via mass accumulation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This two‐stage continental collision includes the first collision between the TH and the LT at ~59 Ma (DeCelles et al, ; Hu et al, ) and a final collision between the TH and the “remaining Greater India” at no later than ~39 Ma based on the latest initial collision age constructed in Figure a (Huang, Lippert, Dekkers, et al, ; Ma et al, ; van Hinsbergen et al, ; Yang, Ma, Bian, et al, ). Notably, considering potential challenges to different collision models described in Hu et al (), as well as debates on the shapes of the leading edges of the collisional units, especially the TH, more late Cretaceous and Paleocene paleomagnetic investigations from the TH and the LT are needed to further constrain the collision history and paleogeography of Greater India (Ali & Aitchison, , ; Ingalls et al, ; Jagoutz et al, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Calculations, assuming mantle wedge enrichment of a 1‐km‐high column over 10 Ma, demonstrate that enrichment could be of the order of 1,000 ppb for uranium (Bailey & Vala Ragnarsdottir, ). In addition, during continent–continent collision, large‐scale subduction of continental crust may result in direct input of high heat‐producing continental crustal material into the lithospheric mantle (Figure ) (Ingalls, Rowley, Currie, & Colman, ).…”
Section: Thermal Evolution Of Anomalous Mantlementioning
confidence: 99%