vital [ 25 ] as it facilitates thick layers (of up to 100 µm) in a single pass, however, at the expense of a lower printing defi nition.Following screen printing typically posttreatments such as drying, annealing, or top-coating are employed to maximize conductivities. The conditions of post-treatment defi ne the substrate that can be used for printing. For example, ink annealing at 250 °C and higher for 30 min [ 18,24,25 ] signifi cantly limits the range of suitable substrates and fundamentally limits high speed R2R industrial realization. Thus, the design of graphene inks that meet the requirements of current R2R applications is still to be accomplished.There are several reports on the preparation of graphene-based inks comprising either graphene oxide (GO), [ 17,19,23,[27][28][29][30] or graphite exfoliated with [ 13,16,18,22,24,25 ] and without [ 20 ] surface active agents. The preparation of inks based on GO is relatively simple. However, due to the low conductivity of GO these inks require harsh post-treatments that make them less relevant to industrial applications. Liquid-phase exfoliation of graphite with or without surfactant by ultrasonication, [ 20,[31][32][33][34] or high-shear mixing [ 22,35 ] is a fl exible, and in the latter case a scalable manufacturing approach. [ 35 ] Nevertheless prolonged high shearing still requires separation of nonexfoliated graphite while the resulting dispersions consist mainly of small (<500 nm) graphene sheets. [ 33,34,36 ] Hence the quality [ 20 ] is far from the one obtained by micromechanical cleavage. [ 37 ] In contrast, expanded graphite (EG) demonstrates much better dispersibility than graphite due to signifi cantly weakened van der Waals interactions on account of an increased distance between the layers. [ 13,[38][39][40] This results in much shorter times and smaller energy input to obtain well-exfoliated concentrated dispersions of typically large (>1 µm) fl ake graphene. [ 39,41 ] Colloidal stability, however, as for the exfoliation of graphite, requires the presence of surface active agents and can be adjusted accordingly. The quality of graphene in EG depends on the precursor used for expansion. For instance, EG obtained from GO exhibits a highly defective structure, [ 41,42 ] whereas EG obtained from either donor-or acceptor-type intercalation compounds (IC) exhibits a much smaller amount of defects and, thus, is more suitable for highly conductive inks. [39][40][41] One of the approaches for ink preparation comprises stabilization of graphene dispersions by surfactants or surface active polymers on account of charge or van der Waals repulsion. This stabilization has been studied and reported by many research