2020 IEEE International Conference on Multisensor Fusion and Integration for Intelligent Systems (MFI) 2020
DOI: 10.1109/mfi49285.2020.9235237
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Large-Scale UAS Traffic Management (UTM) Structure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, regarding the implementation of particular in-flight services, there are different approaches for conflict resolution and emergency management. Many works [28][29][30] have focused on flight planning and scheduling at a strategic level, i.e., in the pre-flight phase; though in-flight automated decision-making has not been properly covered in UTM systems. In general, given the massive search space to find optimal resolutions for conflicts in Very Low-Level (VLL) airspace scenarios, approximate solutions based on heuristic solvers [28] or lane maneuvers [30] predominate over optimal deconfliction approaches.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Finally, regarding the implementation of particular in-flight services, there are different approaches for conflict resolution and emergency management. Many works [28][29][30] have focused on flight planning and scheduling at a strategic level, i.e., in the pre-flight phase; though in-flight automated decision-making has not been properly covered in UTM systems. In general, given the massive search space to find optimal resolutions for conflicts in Very Low-Level (VLL) airspace scenarios, approximate solutions based on heuristic solvers [28] or lane maneuvers [30] predominate over optimal deconfliction approaches.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many works [28][29][30] have focused on flight planning and scheduling at a strategic level, i.e., in the pre-flight phase; though in-flight automated decision-making has not been properly covered in UTM systems. In general, given the massive search space to find optimal resolutions for conflicts in Very Low-Level (VLL) airspace scenarios, approximate solutions based on heuristic solvers [28] or lane maneuvers [30] predominate over optimal deconfliction approaches. In [31], a probabilistic framework is proposed to formulate the risk involved in UAS operations.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies have addressed some of these concerns by proposing corridors and sky-lanes [11,12] and even advocating conceptual rules-of-the-road, such as giving priority for traffic on the right at intersections as a potential means to safely navigate through urban areas [13]. Some have suggested single altitude lane-based approaches that primarily investigated trajectory scheduling algorithms in a way to tackle strategic conflict management [14,15]. While others have focused on conceptual design studies into the use of airway routes over buildings, railways and roads for the city of Singapore [16,17], a majority of the work has been centred on policy-based studies for Europe's advanced air mobility traffic management program, U-Space [18][19][20][21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%