1998
DOI: 10.1007/s003590050228
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Large slow potential shifts occur during halothane anaesthesia in gerbils

Abstract: Continuous recordings were made of slow potential shift activity occurring at six locations on the surface of the cerebral cortex of seizure-prone and non seizure-prone gerbils. Measurements were made for 80-s epochs of recordings of frequency, maximum and minimum slow shift amplitude and baseline potential of the brain during periods of normal inactivity and subsequently during halothane anaesthesia. Induction of anaesthesia initially provoked large (millivolt) slow (3-4 s) oscillations in all animals, larger… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 21 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Many of the mechanisms identified to be responsible for modulating exaggerated pain states cannot be adequately studied in an anesthetized animal. Commonly used anesthetics including isoflurane, halothane, and sodium pentobarbital all affect immune cell and glial activity, beyond their well known suppression of neuronal activation (Itoh et al, 2004; Kudo et al, 2001; Martin et al, 1995; Roughan and Laming, 1998; Toda et al, 2008; Wentlandt et al, 2006; Wise-Faberowski et al, 2006). Thus these mediators cannot be accurately studied in anesthetized animals when immune and/or glial mediators are suspected as potential mediators.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many of the mechanisms identified to be responsible for modulating exaggerated pain states cannot be adequately studied in an anesthetized animal. Commonly used anesthetics including isoflurane, halothane, and sodium pentobarbital all affect immune cell and glial activity, beyond their well known suppression of neuronal activation (Itoh et al, 2004; Kudo et al, 2001; Martin et al, 1995; Roughan and Laming, 1998; Toda et al, 2008; Wentlandt et al, 2006; Wise-Faberowski et al, 2006). Thus these mediators cannot be accurately studied in anesthetized animals when immune and/or glial mediators are suspected as potential mediators.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%