2023
DOI: 10.1038/s41612-023-00532-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Large spread in interannual variance of atmospheric CO2 concentration across CMIP6 Earth System Models

Verónica Martín-Gómez,
Yohan Ruprich-Robert,
Etienne Tourigny
et al.

Abstract: Numerical Earth System Models (ESMs) are our best tool to predict the evolution of atmospheric CO2 concentration and its effect on Global temperature. However, large uncertainties exist among ESMs in the variance of the year-to-year changes of atmospheric CO2 concentration. This prevents us from precisely understanding its past evolution and from accurately estimating its future evolution. Here we analyze various ESMs simulations from the 6th Coupled Model Intercomparison Projects (CMIP6) to understand the ori… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[39] our key assumption may be weak, and detecting peak CO 2 concentrations might in practice be harder. Improvements in Earth systems models may provide improved assessment of peak-CO 2 , but such models would require high-fidelity fire dynamics, a challenging field of ESM development [40], and likely one of the sources of the large range in ESM simulation of pre-industrial CO 2 variability [35].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[39] our key assumption may be weak, and detecting peak CO 2 concentrations might in practice be harder. Improvements in Earth systems models may provide improved assessment of peak-CO 2 , but such models would require high-fidelity fire dynamics, a challenging field of ESM development [40], and likely one of the sources of the large range in ESM simulation of pre-industrial CO 2 variability [35].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To examine peak CO 2 concentration we again modify the method by Rahmstorf et al [20]. However, for peak CO 2 concentration we are less confident in ESM simulations, as preindustrial control simulations show an enormous inter-model range in simulated inter-annual variability in CO 2 concentration [35]. Instead we rely both on ESM results and the instrumental record of atmospheric CO 2 concentration.…”
Section: Peak Co 2 Concentrationmentioning
confidence: 99%