2017
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1613144114
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Large 14 C excursion in 5480 BC indicates an abnormal sun in the mid-Holocene

Abstract: Radiocarbon content in tree rings can be an excellent proxy of the past incoming cosmic ray intensities to Earth. Although such past cosmic ray variations have been studied by measurements of14C contents in tree rings with ≥10-y time resolution for the Holocene, there are few annual14C data. There is a little understanding about annual14C variations in the past, with the exception of a few periods including the AD 774−77514C excursion where annual measurements have been performed. Here, we report the result of… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
82
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(89 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
7
82
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This effect causes a relatively flat period in apparent 14 C age, as has been noted by earlier studies and referred to as the Hallstatt period (Friedrich and Henning 1996;Grabner et al 2007;Jacobssen et al 2017). To continue our comparison with the 660 BC event (Park et al 2017), we note the rise time of that event is about 11-12 years between BC 667.5 to 659.5, similar to the increase observed in 814-804 BC and the 5480 BC event (Miyake et al 2017a). The 660 BC event of Park et al (2017) is an increase followed by a rapid decline, in contrast to the 5480 BC event and our new event presented here.…”
Section: Excursion Beginning At 814-813 Bcsupporting
confidence: 74%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…This effect causes a relatively flat period in apparent 14 C age, as has been noted by earlier studies and referred to as the Hallstatt period (Friedrich and Henning 1996;Grabner et al 2007;Jacobssen et al 2017). To continue our comparison with the 660 BC event (Park et al 2017), we note the rise time of that event is about 11-12 years between BC 667.5 to 659.5, similar to the increase observed in 814-804 BC and the 5480 BC event (Miyake et al 2017a). The 660 BC event of Park et al (2017) is an increase followed by a rapid decline, in contrast to the 5480 BC event and our new event presented here.…”
Section: Excursion Beginning At 814-813 Bcsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…The new events reported here and by Miyake et al (2017a) and Park et al (2017) seem to associate rapid excursions of 14 C with longer-term variations caused by solar minimum-like periodicities. This is a different phenomenon from the apparently short-term and isolated Δ 14 C events at AD 774-775 and AD 993-994.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 54%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…IntCal13 results showing a steep rise of 15.3‰ D 14 C between 7440 and 7410 BP are provided in Figure 1c, but detailed 14 C assays for this period from Bristlecone Pine are also available with a 1-2 y resolution. They demonstrate a large increase (20‰) over ten years, from 7431 to 7421 BP (Miyake et al 2017). Recently, the distance of S165 was revised downward to ~.7 kpc and with an age of approximately 7500 BP; the total energy is estimated at 5 x 10 51 ergs as a Type II event (Yar-Uyaniker et al 2004).…”
Section: Comparison Of Nearby Sne and Late Quaternary 14 C Anomaliesmentioning
confidence: 98%