2021
DOI: 10.1021/acsanm.1c01870
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Large Superparamagnetic FeCo Nanocubes for Magnetic Theranostics

Abstract: In the past few decades, superparamagnetic nanoparticles (SPMNPs) have attracted increasing attention in a wide range of magnetic theranostics including magnetic biosensors, drug delivery, magnetic separation, magnetic imaging, hyperthermia therapy, and so on. Superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles are currently widely used for these purposes despite their low saturation magnetizations (below 80 emu/g). In pursuit of higher magnetic signals (spatial resolutions) for magnetic imaging, higher sensitivity (li… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is of note to mention that the pure FeCo nanoparticles synthesized demonstrated an M S value of ∼130 emu/g, as seen in Figure S7, as would be expected from the literature. Superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles demonstrates sub-80 emu/g M S values, while superparamagnetic FeCo has shown M S values of >220 emu/g . The FeCo nanoparticles we produced are larger and are ∼13 nm and have, according to estimates based on the values of M S (Figure S7b), magnetically inactive oxide layers 1–2 nm thick.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 80%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…It is of note to mention that the pure FeCo nanoparticles synthesized demonstrated an M S value of ∼130 emu/g, as seen in Figure S7, as would be expected from the literature. Superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles demonstrates sub-80 emu/g M S values, while superparamagnetic FeCo has shown M S values of >220 emu/g . The FeCo nanoparticles we produced are larger and are ∼13 nm and have, according to estimates based on the values of M S (Figure S7b), magnetically inactive oxide layers 1–2 nm thick.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles demonstrates sub-80 emu/g M S values, while superparamagnetic FeCo has shown M S values of >220 emu/g. 66 The FeCo nanoparticles we produced are larger and are ∼13 nm and have, according to estimates based on the values of M S (Figure S7b), magnetically inactive oxide layers 1−2 nm thick. Previous groups who have attempted the synthesis of metaldoped plasmonic FeCo�namely, Ag/FeCo/Ag NPs�have seen M S values of ∼30−40 emu/g, even lower than that of iron oxide nanoparticles.…”
Section: ■ Introductionmentioning
confidence: 77%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The remanent magnetization for the MNCs is 15 emu g −1 , which is in agreement with the data in the literature. [ 50,51 ] Thus, the ratio of remanent magnetization to saturation magnetization, Mr/Ms$M_{\text{r}}/M_{\text{$\text{s}$}}$, is only 0.068 in the MNCs. In contrast, the randomly‐oriented FeCo chain sample exhibits a remanent magnetization of M r = 28 emu g −1 and M r / M s ratio of 0.127, which is almost twice that of FeCo MNCs.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%