2017
DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msx197
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Large Variation in the Ratio of Mitochondrial to Nuclear Mutation Rate across Animals: Implications for Genetic Diversity and the Use of Mitochondrial DNA as a Molecular Marker

Abstract: It is commonly assumed that mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) evolves at a faster rate than nuclear DNA (nuDNA) in animals. This has contributed to the popularity of mtDNA as a molecular marker in evolutionary studies. Analyzing 121 multilocus data sets and four phylogenomic data sets encompassing 4,676 species of animals, we demonstrate that the ratio of mitochondrial over nuclear mutation rate is highly variable among animal taxa. In nonvertebrates, such as insects and arachnids, the ratio of mtDNA over nuDNA mutati… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

11
232
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 299 publications
(243 citation statements)
references
References 80 publications
11
232
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A nuclear DNA mutation rate of 1.42 × 10 −9 substitutions per site per year estimated for the ranoid frog genus Leptopelis (Allio, Donega, Galtier, & Nabholz, ) was used to convert parameter estimates into real world values such as population divergence time in years, effective population size in individuals and population migration rate in individual migrants per generation. All values for Theta and Tau generated by g ‐ phocs are scaled by 10 −4 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A nuclear DNA mutation rate of 1.42 × 10 −9 substitutions per site per year estimated for the ranoid frog genus Leptopelis (Allio, Donega, Galtier, & Nabholz, ) was used to convert parameter estimates into real world values such as population divergence time in years, effective population size in individuals and population migration rate in individual migrants per generation. All values for Theta and Tau generated by g ‐ phocs are scaled by 10 −4 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Understanding the emergence and maintenance of genetic differentiation exposes fundamental evolutionary processes over a range of spatial and temporal scales. The resolution of such studies has advanced greatly since the onset of DNA sequencing (Allio, Donega, Galtier, & Nabholz, ; Bazin, Glémin, & Galtier, ; Lewontin, ; Nabholz, Mauffrey, Bazin, Galtier, & Glemin, ; Mackintosh et al, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite this clear theoretical statement, DNA polymorphism appeared to be weakly correlated to population size and, when correlations have been found, the genetic diversity revealed is orders of magnitude smaller than expected based on differences in population size (Bazin et al, ; Leffler et al, ; Nabholz et al, ; Romiguier et al, ; Mackintosh et al, ). Moreover, the results greatly varied among studies comparing genetic diversity for different taxa as well as when using different genetic markers (such as allozymes, nuclear or mitochondrial markers; Allio et al, ; Bazin et al, ; Fujisawa, Vogler, & Barraclough, ; Leffler et al, ; Nabholz, Glémin, & Galtier, ; Nabholz et al, ; Romiguier et al, ; Mackintosh et al, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Mitochondrial DNA markers are valued for phylogenetic reconstructions using both museum and fresh samples because nucleic acids degrade over time and mitochondrial genomes (mtDNA) are available at much higher copy numbers per cell compared with single‐copy nuclear DNA (Höss, ; Wandeler et al ., ) and because mtDNA has reliable barcoding properties across vertebrates, including fishes (Allio et al ., ). Despite its uniparental inheritance, mtDNA remains an important marker in studies of the S. trutta complex partly because so much data are already available from previous salmonid studies (Bernatchez et al ., ; Crête‐Lafrenière et al ., ; Snoj et al ., ; Sušnik et al ., ; Verspoor et al ., ) and partly because a well‐supported mtDNA‐based hypothesis of phylogenetic relationships is available (Bernatchez, ; Cortey et al ., ; Sanz, ; Snoj et al ., ; Vera et al ., ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%