2011
DOI: 10.1007/s10614-011-9285-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Largest Consistent Set in International Environmental Agreements

Abstract: IEA, Farsightedness, Implementation, F50, C60,

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Unlike [14,15,16,17] which focus on stable end results, our model allows insights about the process. We assume these dynamic possibilities:…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unlike [14,15,16,17] which focus on stable end results, our model allows insights about the process. We assume these dynamic possibilities:…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The literature focusing on the stability of linked markets is of special interest to us. The first paper in this area is Biancardi and Villani [14], which used a two-stage, noncooperative game theoretic model to study international environmental agreements in a pollution abatement model with a quadratic cost function and symmetric jurisdictions. Each jurisdiction first decides whether to join the coalition and then chooses its quantity of pollution abatements.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Biancardi (2010), using a dynamic model with a stock pollutant where countries play a differential game in the second stage, also confirms the results of Sartzetakis (2002, 2006) on the different implications of myopic and farsighted stability. Both Biancardi (2010) and Biancardi and Villani (2011) show that the higher the environmental awareness of countries the more likely the large coalitions are formed under farsighted stability.…”
Section: Farsighted Gamesmentioning
confidence: 99%