2012
DOI: 10.2478/v10086-012-0028-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Larval rearing of ide (Leuciscus idus (L.)) using decapsulated Artemia

Abstract: Abstract. The use of decapsulated Artemia cysts as food for ide, Leuciscus idus (L.), larviculture was investigated. Three days after hatching, the larvae were fed on different diets: (a) dried decapsulated Artemia cysts, (b) Artemia nauplii, (c) Artemia nauplii for 7 days and then trout starter, (d) diet for marine larvae (manufactured artificial diet), (e) trout starter. After a 21-day rearing period, the highest survival rate was obtained with the larvae receiving decapsulated Artemia cysts. Feeding of the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…L. cephalus larvae fed on a mixed diet of Artemia 1 commercial feed A produced a similar growth rate (in length and weight) as those fed solely on Artemia, with similar survival, but not when fed on commercial feeds A and B in isolation. Similarly, it was revealed that compared to dry food, the feeding of decapsulated Artemia significantly increased the growth rates of L. cephalus and orfe (Leuciscus idus), although these studies did not also commercial fed live and dry feeds [5,19]. Previous studies have also recognised the problems with the use of dry diets in larviculture, producing similar results to this study regarding survival rates.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 77%
“…L. cephalus larvae fed on a mixed diet of Artemia 1 commercial feed A produced a similar growth rate (in length and weight) as those fed solely on Artemia, with similar survival, but not when fed on commercial feeds A and B in isolation. Similarly, it was revealed that compared to dry food, the feeding of decapsulated Artemia significantly increased the growth rates of L. cephalus and orfe (Leuciscus idus), although these studies did not also commercial fed live and dry feeds [5,19]. Previous studies have also recognised the problems with the use of dry diets in larviculture, producing similar results to this study regarding survival rates.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 77%
“…However, in the present study the statistically better survival rates were observed in groups fed exclusively on live food and on decapsulated cysts of Artemia. This later kind of food seemed to be very promising as an alternative kind of food for common tench larvae what was already proved for chub Leuciscus cephalus (L.) (Shiri Harzevili et al, 2003) and ide Leuciscus idus (L.) larvae (Shiri Harzevili et al, 2004). In view of the results obtained it could be suggested that the transition applied did not influence the rearing parameters such as ITL and SGR between GF and PF groups in experiments.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…Decapsulated Artemia cysts were applied successfully as the first feed during rearing of ide (Shiri Harzevili et al 2004), chub (Shiri Harzevili et al 2003) and carp (Vanhaecke et al 1990). Common carp, goldfish and rudd larvae, which are comparable in size to crucian carp, were successfully reared with commercial feeds as a sole food already (AbiAyad and Kestemont 1994; Carvalho et al 1997;Wolnicki et al 2009).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%