Laryngeal function after supracricoid laryngectomy

Saito, Koichiro; Araki, Koji; Ogawa, Kaoru; Shiotani, Akiko

doi:10.1016/j.otohns.2008.12.036

Cited by 43 publications

(53 citation statements)

References 17 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…35,36 Others recognize the alteration of voice quality that ensues after partial laryngectomy but still advocate for open conservation techniques given the maintenance of near-normal overall QOL. [37][38][39] Undeniably, the lack of a comparative methodology decreases the reliability and reproducibility of such outcome reports.…”

Section: Quality Of Life After Conservation Surgerymentioning

confidence: 99%

Quality of Life After Conservation Surgery for Laryngeal Cancer

Sadoughi¹

2015

Otolaryngologic Clinics of North America

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Quality Of Life After Conservation Surgerymentioning

confidence: 99%

Quality of Life After Conservation Surgery for Laryngeal Cancer

Sadoughi¹

2015

Otolaryngologic Clinics of North America

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Self-assessment of vocal quality performed by groups supracricoid partial laryngectomy and total laryngectomy Studies show divergences of opinions concerning vocal quality, considering that communication goes beyond an impaired voice (24,25,26) . Some authors defended the patients' satisfaction with their voice in the presence of an intelligible communication (4,24,27) .…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Desvantagem vocal e estratégias de enfrentamento nas disfonias após laringectomias

Oliveira

Marialva

2017

Audiol., Commun. Res.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Introduction:The laryngeal cancer treatment causes significant changes in the quality of life. Purpose: To assess and compare the vocal handicap and the coping strategies to deal with the vocal handicap resulting from supracricoid and total laryngectomy. Methods: Analytical, prospective observational study of groups of subjects with the same disease. Seventeen subjects were assessed and divided in two groups; the first with eight male subjects submitted to supracricoid partial laryngectomy, with cricohyoidoepiglottopexy, mean age of 67,5; and a second group with nine subjects, two women and seven men, submitted to total laryngectomy, mean age of 64,3. All subjects answered the Vocal Handicap Index-10 (VHI-10) and the Coping Strategies in Dysphonia Protocol (PEED-27). Results: The mean values of raw scores obtained with the VHI-10 by the two groups did not reveal significant differences, matching studies involving dysphonic patients. Both groups use an elevated number of coping strategies for vocal problems: the first group presented mean raw scores of 65,75 and the second group, 59,22. Conclusion:The comparison between subjects submitted to supracricoid laryngectomy and total laryngectomy does not evidence differences concerning the self-assessment of voice, vocal handicap and coping strategies to deal with vocal problems. Both groups use more than the double of coping strategies for vocal problems, with a predominant focus on emotion.

show abstract

“…Median decannulation time was 22 days (IQR = 19) in our study. Various studies report decannulation times varying from 7 to 38 days [6,7,8,26,27]. The wide range of decannulation time is attributed to the surgical technique, the performance of the patient and the clinical decision of the surgeon.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Post-Surgical and Oncologic Outcomes of Supracricoid Partial Laryngectomy: A Single-Institution Report of Ninety Cases

Öztürk¹,

Akyıldız²,

Göde³

et al. 2016

ORL

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective: The aim of this study was to report the post-surgical and oncologic outcomes of patients who underwent supracricoid partial laryngectomy (SCPL). Methods: 90 patients who underwent SCPL between 1994 and 2014 were reviewed. 45 patients underwent cricohyoidopexy (CHP) and 45 patients cricohyoidoepiglottopexy (CHEP). Median nasogastric (NG) tube removal time, decannulation time, overall survival, disease-free survival and local control rates were calculated. The effect of the type of surgery on functional and oncologic outcomes were assessed. Results: Median NG tube removal time was 16.5 days (IQR = 10) and 14 days (IQR = 9) in CHP and CHEP patients, respectively (p > 0.05). Median decannulation time was 30 days (IQR = 26) and 19 days (IQR = 15) in CHP and CHEP patients, respectively (p < 0.05). Resection of one arytenoid significantly increased NG tube removal time. Median follow-up time was 55 months. There were 15 oncologic failures and the median time interval for tumor recurrence was 9 months. Five-year overall survival rate was 80.4%. The 3- and 5-year disease-free specific survival rates were 81.7 and 76.7%, respectively. Conclusions: Given the more extensive surgery applied for CHP, functional outcomes were better in patients with CHEP. Resection of an arytenoid had a negative outcome on swallowing.

show abstract

Laryngeal function after supracricoid laryngectomy

Abstract: Acceptable functional recovery and tolerable QOL can be achieved after SCL.

Cited by 43 publications

References 17 publications

Quality of Life After Conservation Surgery for Laryngeal Cancer

Quality of Life After Conservation Surgery for Laryngeal Cancer

Desvantagem vocal e estratégias de enfrentamento nas disfonias após laringectomias

Post-Surgical and Oncologic Outcomes of Supracricoid Partial Laryngectomy: A Single-Institution Report of Ninety Cases

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About