1999
DOI: 10.2307/2586503
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lascar strong types in some simple theories

Abstract: In this paper a class of simple theories, called the low theories is developed, and the following is proved.Theorem. Let T be a low theory, A a set and a, b elements realizing the same strong type over A. Then, a and b realize the same Lasear strong type over A.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
44
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
2
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Let a realize ϕ, and b realize ψ. Since a and b are in the same class C , they realize the same strong type over ∅, so by Theorem 3.1 of [5], they realize the same Lascar strong type over ∅. Hence, by the Independence Theorem for Lascar strong types (Theorem 5.8 of [25]), there is an element c ∈ acl(A ∪ B) , a i )), as required.…”
Section: Proposition 46 Let γ = (V γ E) Be a Countably Infinite Grmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Let a realize ϕ, and b realize ψ. Since a and b are in the same class C , they realize the same strong type over ∅, so by Theorem 3.1 of [5], they realize the same Lascar strong type over ∅. Hence, by the Independence Theorem for Lascar strong types (Theorem 5.8 of [25]), there is an element c ∈ acl(A ∪ B) , a i )), as required.…”
Section: Proposition 46 Let γ = (V γ E) Be a Countably Infinite Grmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Dividing in type denable, so in dependent theories all these notions are type-denable over A (i.e. dependent theories are low, see [Bue99]) Proof. (Due to Itai Ben Yaacov) First we shall see that for any set B, if ϕ (x, a) divides over B then it k := alt (ϕ) divides over B. if a i |i < ω is an indiscernible sequence witnessing m > k dividing but not k dividing, it means that ∃x i<k ϕ (x, a i ), and by indiscerniblity, ∃x i<k ϕ (x, a mi ).…”
Section: Proof Suppose ϕ (X A)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For simple theories, (2) is equivalent to Buechler's original definition[1] which asked that for every ϕ, D(x = x, {ϕ}, ℵ 0 ) < ω.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%