2015
DOI: 10.1103/physreva.92.013423
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Laser-assisted inelastic scattering of electrons by helium atoms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As experiment showing a zero at = 0. The double peak structure in the experimental data can be attributed to Fraunhofer diffraction effects [1][2][3][4][5][6] with the minimum in the experiment occurring at the predicted first dark band of a single slit diffraction pattern. These features have been accurately reproduced with models based on semiclassical atomic or molecular orbital expansions [2,3,5,6].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As experiment showing a zero at = 0. The double peak structure in the experimental data can be attributed to Fraunhofer diffraction effects [1][2][3][4][5][6] with the minimum in the experiment occurring at the predicted first dark band of a single slit diffraction pattern. These features have been accurately reproduced with models based on semiclassical atomic or molecular orbital expansions [2,3,5,6].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The double peak structure in the experimental data can be attributed to Fraunhofer diffraction effects [1][2][3][4][5][6] with the minimum in the experiment occurring at the predicted first dark band of a single slit diffraction pattern. These features have been accurately reproduced with models based on semiclassical atomic or molecular orbital expansions [2,3,5,6]. In these models, a direct comparison between the mathematical expression for the differential cross section and that of the light intensity in classical single slit diffraction shows nearly identical functional forms [3].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the end of the interaction t = t f , we calculate the 2D-momentum distribution of the photoelectron from the Fourier transform of the spatial ionization wave function ψ ioniz 50, 51 . The latter is evaluated using a projection technique 52,53 . In this technique, we consider orthogonal projection operatorsP andQ, such that Q = 1 −P = 1 − N ∑ n |ψ n ψ n |,…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although this approximation is valid only at high electron energies, it has been shown to provide new insights into the inelastic scattering process assisted by laser fields, in particular in the regime where the perturbation theory for laser-atom interactions breaks down. For instance, it has been shown that the computed differential cross-sections encode information about the avoided crossing induced by a resonant laser field [23], which in turn can be controlled by varying the properties of the laser fields, as well as those of the monoenergetic electron beam [24,25]. At a low electron energy, the second-order Born approximation is required in order to take into account the additional effects such as the exchange effects [26,27], which are necessary for the precise comparison with an experiment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%