2020
DOI: 10.1007/s11082-020-2231-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Laser cleaning of archaeologically corroded iron objects with inlays

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This new technique seemed very promising for conservation treatments at a time where heritage objects needed cleaning more frequently [2]. Since Asmus' works, many studies on laser cleaning have been conducted and explored the differences induced by changing the laser parameters such as the emitting wavelength, the laser energy, and the pulse duration on different materials and various contaminants including biological colonization (lichens, algae) [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14], black sulphated gypsum crusts [15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24], dirt and environmental soiling [25], corrosion products [26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34], or graffiti [35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47]…”
Section: The Development Of Laser Cleaning For Heritage Conservationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This new technique seemed very promising for conservation treatments at a time where heritage objects needed cleaning more frequently [2]. Since Asmus' works, many studies on laser cleaning have been conducted and explored the differences induced by changing the laser parameters such as the emitting wavelength, the laser energy, and the pulse duration on different materials and various contaminants including biological colonization (lichens, algae) [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14], black sulphated gypsum crusts [15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24], dirt and environmental soiling [25], corrosion products [26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34], or graffiti [35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47]…”
Section: The Development Of Laser Cleaning For Heritage Conservationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Femtosecond pulse laser cleaning of corroded archaeological copper alloys was studied by Korenberg et al using an excimer laser emitting at 248 nm, but the laser fluence used (0.35 J cm −2 ) was not sufficient to remove the corrosion products [83]. Compared to other conventional cleaning systems, an 800 nm laser with 100 fs pulse duration was found to be the best option to remove corrosion layers from an iron belt pad with gilded silver foil inlay from the ten-thirteenth century, with minimal conversion of goethite into magnetite, and no melting [30]. However, the low repetition rate (10 Hz) made the process highly time-consuming.…”
Section: An Alternative Approach For Laser Heritage Cleaningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is also necessary to optimize the laser process parameters and select suitable laser equipment. Prokuratov et al [45] used several kinds of laser to remove the ferric oxide layer and found that nearly every kind of laser could cause the oxide layer to dehydrate into an Fe 3 O 4 layer, which caused the cleaning surface to become dark. Only a Ti:Sa laser with a pulse width of 800 nm and a pulse frequency of 150 Hz could remove the oxide layer without changing surface color, but the cleaning efficiency was very low.…”
Section: Nonmetallic Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to above results, it can be concluded that the safe power intensity for the cleaning of ductile iron substrate is about 320 W, corresponding to 10.86 J/cm 2 (1.086 × 10 8 W/cm 2 ), which is close to the calculated result. According to literatures [10,[23][24][25], the thick surface layer can be completely removed by increasing cleaning times. us, in following experiments, average laser power is adjusted to 320 W and other parameters are kept the same with prior experiments.…”
Section: Mathematical Problems In Engineeringmentioning
confidence: 99%