2005
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2004.02344.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Laser Doppler imager (LDI) scanner and intradermal injection for in vivo pharmacology in human skin microcirculation: responses to acetylcholine, endothelin‐1 and their repeatability

Abstract: AimsThe purpose of this study was to evaluate the repeatability of forearm skin blood fl ow responses to intradermal injections of acetylcholine (ACh) and endothelin-1 (ET-1) using a double injection technique (DIT) and a laser Doppler imager (LDI) scanner in the human skin microcirculation. MethodsWe used a laser Doppler imager (Moor LDI V3.01) to continuously monitor the change in skin blood flow during intradermal administration of physiological saline (0.9% NaCl), acetylcholine (ACh 10 -7 , 10 -8 , 10 -9 M… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Multiple linear regression models were constructed to explore the independent determinants of the major outcomes: percent change in perfusion units from baseline to heating and percent change in area under the curve from baseline to heating. The use of the area under the curve in the assessment of skin microvascular reactivity using laser Doppler flow is well-validated, because it represents the overall flux response to different physiological and pharmacological stimuli (23)(24)(25)(26). Initial models for percent change in perfusion units or percent change in area under the curve included T1D group and were adjusted for skin temperature differences between groups and either baseline perfusion units or baseline area under the curve, respectively.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multiple linear regression models were constructed to explore the independent determinants of the major outcomes: percent change in perfusion units from baseline to heating and percent change in area under the curve from baseline to heating. The use of the area under the curve in the assessment of skin microvascular reactivity using laser Doppler flow is well-validated, because it represents the overall flux response to different physiological and pharmacological stimuli (23)(24)(25)(26). Initial models for percent change in perfusion units or percent change in area under the curve included T1D group and were adjusted for skin temperature differences between groups and either baseline perfusion units or baseline area under the curve, respectively.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Erythrocytes reflect the laser beam, which enables the recording of the returning signal using a detector positioned in the scanner head. The returning signal is converted to an electrical signal, which is proportional to tissue perfusion (22). The underlying perfusion intensity values are expressed according to the diVerent color scale (23), extending from blue (low perfusion values) over green and yellow to red (highest perfusion values).…”
Section: Cellmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In pilot experiments, we assessed responses at different times and also found no differences but due to a single application of sulfaphenazole the problem could not be entirely overcome. On the other hand, the advantage of the microinjection method over some other methods is that it enables topical application of minimum quantity of vasoactive drug directly to the microcirculation with negligible systemic effects and as such excludes a possible effect of the drug to conductive vessels that may be different from the effect on microvessels and may interfere with the microvessel-effect (Wenzel, 1997;Binggeli et al, 2003;Leslie et al, 2003;Opazo Saez et al, 2005;Gaubert et al, 2007).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To investigate whether EDHF is a CYP 2C9 metabolite in human skin, we used a specific CYP 2C9 inhibitor, sulfaphenazole. Drugs (L-NMMA, diclofenac and sulfaphenazole) were applied by an intradermal microinjection, described elsewhere (Wenzel, 1997;Leslie et al, 2003;Opazo Saez et al, 2005;Lenasi & Strucl, 2008); saline was injected as a control. 10 ll of solution was injected into the forearm skin through 50-ll-graduated needles (30G; Hamilton, Bonaduz, Schweiz).…”
Section: Intradermal Microinjectionmentioning
confidence: 99%