2009
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.14797.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Laser guide stars for extremely large telescopes: efficient Shack-Hartmann wavefront sensor design using the weighted centre-of-gravity algorithm

Abstract: Over the last few years increasing consideration has been given to the study of laser guide stars (LGS) for the measurement of the disturbance introduced by the atmosphere in optical and near‐infrared (near‐IR) astronomical observations from the ground. A possible method for the generation of a LGS is the excitation of the sodium layer in the upper atmosphere at approximately 90 km of altitude. Since the sodium layer is approximately 10 km thick, the artificial reference source looks elongated, especially when… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A laser guide star is not only at a finite distance leading to cone effect, but also extended over the whole thickness of the sodium layer. A Shack-Hartmann WFS (SH WFS) looking at a LGS is confronted to spot elongation leading to specific slope noise [1] with possibly anisoplanatism [2,5]. Systems using multiple LGS beams with CW lasers are also affected by fratricide effect.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A laser guide star is not only at a finite distance leading to cone effect, but also extended over the whole thickness of the sodium layer. A Shack-Hartmann WFS (SH WFS) looking at a LGS is confronted to spot elongation leading to specific slope noise [1] with possibly anisoplanatism [2,5]. Systems using multiple LGS beams with CW lasers are also affected by fratricide effect.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this paper, we explore the interactions between the spot elongation and fratricide effects, with analytical tomographic modal wavefront reconstruction techniques to eventually define a preferred launching scheme. This is a generalization of the noise propagation of the work presented in [1] to a multi-LGS constellation sensed through a multi-layer turbulence profile supplementing the work done in [3]. We envisage the impact of these effects in terms of SH WFS accuracy and related performance on central direction in the scientific field of view (FoV) for MAORY/ATLAS/EAGLE projects [6][7][8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The threshold value for the normal Thresholding is 10% of the maximum [8] and the threshold for the peak finder in the correlation method is 1% at high SNR and 60% at low SNR. Another useful algorithm not described in this paper is the weighted centroid [9], [3], [10]. The next step is to reconstruct the wavefront using a Fourier Transform reconstructor [11].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A single subaperture spot pattern is simulated by convolving the vertical sodium layer density profile (length proportional to the elongation length defined in Eqn. 13 with atmosphere like phase screen (Schreiber et al, 2009). The simulated phase screen includes the effect of the round trip that the laser has undertaken and the phase screens can be easily simulated based on a Fourier technique (Harding et al, 1999).…”
Section: Improved Iteratively Weighted Center Of Gravitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The result from the simulation of an elongated spot pattern (no atmosphere) with the launch point matching with the center of the telescope aperture is shown in Fig 6. Another problem along with the non uniform elongation is the temporal variability of the vertical sodium density profile (Davis et al, 2006). Hence, an advanced image processing tool is necessary for accurate detection of the centroid position in the case of LGS based Shack Hartmann sensor (Schreiber et al, 2009;Thomas et al, 2008).…”
Section: Improved Iteratively Weighted Center Of Gravitymentioning
confidence: 99%