2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2011.05.044
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Laser in situ keratomileusis flap-thickness predictability with a pendular microkeratome

Abstract: Flap-thickness predictability was influenced by preoperative CCT only. All cuts were significantly thinner than the head thickness regardless of the suction ring size. Second surgical eyes had thinner flaps, possibly from blade deterioration from the first cut. Approximately 100 flaps were required as a learning curve.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…11,12 Current mechanical microkeratomes create LASIK flaps with an SD of approximately 22 to 26 mm. 9,6,13,14 In this study, flap thickness was found to have excellent predictability with a lower SD (13.9 mm) for flap- thickness variability compared with that generally achieved by mechanical microkeratomes. In addition, consecutive patients who had LASIK for myopia, hyperopia, and mixed astigmatism with flaps made using this new femtosecond laser had good, predictable, and stable outcomes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…11,12 Current mechanical microkeratomes create LASIK flaps with an SD of approximately 22 to 26 mm. 9,6,13,14 In this study, flap thickness was found to have excellent predictability with a lower SD (13.9 mm) for flap- thickness variability compared with that generally achieved by mechanical microkeratomes. In addition, consecutive patients who had LASIK for myopia, hyperopia, and mixed astigmatism with flaps made using this new femtosecond laser had good, predictable, and stable outcomes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…In both studies,13,14 the precision was found to be at least 0.15 mm, which is a very large standard deviation and more uncertain than the corresponding FS200-created flaps, as measured by our digital technique.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…Thus, we introduce this novel technique as a new benchmark for evaluating flap dimensions in LASIK. In another recently published study that examined the predictability of dimensions for flaps created using a pendular microkeratome,13 it was found that the microkeratome achieved a mean flap diameter of 9.2 mm using the 9.0 mm ring and 9.8 mm using the 10.0 mm ring, indicating a precision in the order of 0.2 mm.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The same conclusion is brought by Pallikaris [ 7 ], stating that corneal keratometric values are irrelevant to keratome complication risk in general or specifically to FF risk. Mitsutoshi et al [ 9 ] found in 0.14% FF incidence that neither flat and steep keratometries nor vertical and horizontal white-to-white corneal diameters were correlated to the incidence of flap complications in general or FF specifically. The last two studies did not use the SBK MK, but nevertheless, their conclusions also correspond to this study’s finding of keratometry not being related to FF incidence.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mitsutoshi [ 9 ] also reported 25 (0.67%) flap complications in 3,751 LASIKs done by 10 young surgeons using five different MKs and not the SBK. Three of the flap complications (0.08% of all LASIKs) were FF and all happened only with a single model of the five MKs (LSK one by Moria, France).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%