2000
DOI: 10.1046/j.1443-1661.2000.00010.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Laser Lithotripsy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(3) LL ① Equipment: Since the first report of successful retrograde laser-induced shock-wave lithotripsy of bile duct stones in 1986, 9 various solid-state laser and pulseddye laser systems have been developed and introduced for bile duct stone lithotripsy. 29 The combination of a rhodamine 6G-dye laser with a stone/tissue detection system, which minimizes the risk of bile duct injury, allows the safe disintegration of bile duct stones without cholangioscopic guidance. 8,30 However, this system is expensive, bulky, requires a highvoltage supply, 8 and has limited fragmentation power.…”
Section: 28mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(3) LL ① Equipment: Since the first report of successful retrograde laser-induced shock-wave lithotripsy of bile duct stones in 1986, 9 various solid-state laser and pulseddye laser systems have been developed and introduced for bile duct stone lithotripsy. 29 The combination of a rhodamine 6G-dye laser with a stone/tissue detection system, which minimizes the risk of bile duct injury, allows the safe disintegration of bile duct stones without cholangioscopic guidance. 8,30 However, this system is expensive, bulky, requires a highvoltage supply, 8 and has limited fragmentation power.…”
Section: 28mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For such cases, several techniques have been developed to reduce the size of a stone before removal, including mechanical lithotripsy, use of a basket to crush the stone, electrohydraulic lithotripsy (EHL), [2][3][4][5] extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy, 6 and laser lithotripsy. 7 Of these methods, mechanical lithotripsy is the favored treatment modality for patients in whom conventional endoscopy and sphincterotomy fail to remove the stones. 8,9 In some cases, however, mechanical lithotripsy is relatively cumbersome, time-consuming, more complex, or ineffective.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%