2022
DOI: 10.3390/ma15165777
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Laser Powder Bed Fusion Process Parameters’ Optimization for Fabrication of Dense IN 625

Abstract: This paper presents an experimental study on the influence of the main Laser Powder Bed Fusion (PBF-LB) process parameters on the density and surface quality of the IN 625 superalloy manufactured using the Lasertec 30 SLM machine. Parameters’ influence was investigated within a workspace defined by the laser power (150–400 W), scanning speed (500–900 m/s), scanning strategy (90° and 67°), layer thickness (30–70 µm), and hatch distance (0.09–0.12 µm). Experimental results showed that laser power and scanning sp… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, the relationship between 𝑃 𝐿 and part density in PBF-LB/M is only limited and applicable for producing Nd-based feedstocks via PBF-LB/M and may depend on various factors, such as the 𝐷 L , 𝑣 𝑠 , powder bed properties, and process parameters. [48] It is noteworthy that the thermal-microstructural simulations were performed with unity absorption. In other words, a complete power absorption within the laser spot was assumed, whereas such absorption has been shown to depend on 𝑃 𝐿 and 𝐷 L [49,50] .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the relationship between 𝑃 𝐿 and part density in PBF-LB/M is only limited and applicable for producing Nd-based feedstocks via PBF-LB/M and may depend on various factors, such as the 𝐷 L , 𝑣 𝑠 , powder bed properties, and process parameters. [48] It is noteworthy that the thermal-microstructural simulations were performed with unity absorption. In other words, a complete power absorption within the laser spot was assumed, whereas such absorption has been shown to depend on 𝑃 𝐿 and 𝐷 L [49,50] .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In compiling our dataset, we favored data measured via image analysis but also included some data measured via the Archimedes method. This approach was adopted for two main reasons: firstly, the discrepancy between the two methods is typically minor within our low-porosity region of interest 32 , 33 , and the errors of relative densities far from 98% are disregarded as the relative density is normalized by the sigmoid function. Secondly, as supported by Halevy et al 34 , larger datasets with some measurement errors are generally more beneficial for training and generalization than smaller, flawless datasets.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Powder Bed Fusion (PBF) [ 54 , 55 ] and Directed Energy Deposition (DED) [ 56 ] are also characterized by their unique process parameters that have direct implications on surface quality. While the powder bed fusion techniques such as SLS, SLM, DMLS, and L-PBF ( Table 1 ) are fundamentally identical processes that use a laser to selectively melt or sinter a bed of powder material to create a 3D object, there exist some differences in the way these processes work, such as the type of laser used, the power of the laser, and the scanning strategy used to melt or sinter the powder.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%