2011
DOI: 10.5644/ama2006-124.2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Laser resurfacing of skin flaps: an experimental comparison of three different lasers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, those studies used higher settings with multiple passes. [15][16][17] Therefore, the authors recommend safe settings in ►Tables 3-5. When combining rhytidectomy with CO 2 or Er-YAG laser resurfacing, there is a risk of irreversible injury to the undermined thin skin flap.…”
Section: Flap Necrosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, those studies used higher settings with multiple passes. [15][16][17] Therefore, the authors recommend safe settings in ►Tables 3-5. When combining rhytidectomy with CO 2 or Er-YAG laser resurfacing, there is a risk of irreversible injury to the undermined thin skin flap.…”
Section: Flap Necrosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…18 Various animal models have shown flap necrosis and deleterious effects of laser treatment; however, those studies used higher settings with multiple passes. 19,20,21 Consequently, the authors advocate the settings as described in the text and ▶ …”
Section: Flap Necrosismentioning
confidence: 99%